NXGPY
Price
$81.65
Change
-$1.93 (-2.31%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
11.49B
RTMAF
Price
$1.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
119.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NXGPY vs RTMAF

Header iconNXGPY vs RTMAF Comparison
Open Charts NXGPY vs RTMAFBanner chart's image
Next Group
Price$81.65
Change-$1.93 (-2.31%)
Volume$619
Capitalization11.49B
Reitmans (Canada)
Price$1.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization119.41M
NXGPY vs RTMAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NXGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NXGPY vs. RTMAF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NXGPY is a Hold and RTMAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (NXGPY: $81.65 vs. RTMAF: $1.50)
Brand notoriety: NXGPY and RTMAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NXGPY: 80% vs. RTMAF: 35%
Market capitalization -- NXGPY: $11.49B vs. RTMAF: $119.41M
NXGPY [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $11.49B. RTMAF’s [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] market capitalization is $119.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $119.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $13.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NXGPY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRTMAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NXGPY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RTMAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NXGPY is a better buy in the long-term than RTMAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NXGPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTMAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NXGPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RTMAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NXGPY is a better buy in the short-term than RTMAF.

Price Growth

NXGPY (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а -1.34% price change this week, while RTMAF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was +7.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

NXGPY is expected to report earnings on Apr 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+3.54% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NXGPY($11.5B) has a higher market cap than RTMAF($119M). NXGPY has higher P/E ratio than RTMAF: NXGPY (12.87) vs RTMAF (1.99). NXGPY YTD gains are higher at: 27.394 vs. RTMAF (-8.648). NXGPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.11B vs. RTMAF (92.9M). NXGPY has higher revenues than RTMAF: NXGPY (5.03B) vs RTMAF (812M).
NXGPYRTMAFNXGPY / RTMAF
Capitalization11.5B119M9,664%
EBITDA1.11B92.9M1,198%
Gain YTD27.394-8.648-317%
P/E Ratio12.871.99646%
Revenue5.03B812M620%
Total CashN/A69.4M-
Total DebtN/A96.5M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NXGPY vs RTMAF: Fundamental Ratings
NXGPY
RTMAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8933
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2256
SMR RATING
1..100
3388
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
163
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RTMAF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as NXGPY (86). This means that RTMAF’s stock grew similarly to NXGPY’s over the last 12 months.

NXGPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTMAF (56). This means that NXGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RTMAF’s over the last 12 months.

NXGPY's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTMAF (88). This means that NXGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RTMAF’s over the last 12 months.

NXGPY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as RTMAF (60). This means that NXGPY’s stock grew similarly to RTMAF’s over the last 12 months.

RTMAF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as NXGPY (16). This means that RTMAF’s stock grew similarly to NXGPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NXGPYRTMAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NXGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UMDD25.030.61
+2.49%
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
XMHQ104.251.71
+1.67%
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
SCHJ24.760.02
+0.10%
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
PZC6.04N/A
N/A
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund III
CSNR27.19-0.11
-0.42%
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Act ETF

NXGPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NXGPY and NXGPF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NXGPY and NXGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NXGPY
1D Price
Change %
NXGPY100%
N/A
NXGPF - NXGPY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTMAF - NXGPY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CURV - NXGPY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
RROTF - NXGPY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZTAF - NXGPY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RTMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTMAF and BZTAF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTMAF and BZTAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTMAF
1D Price
Change %
RTMAF100%
N/A
BZTAF - RTMAF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXGPY - RTMAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTMNF - RTMAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMKYF - RTMAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXGPF - RTMAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More