Advertisement
NXGPY vs RTMAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NXGPY is a Hold and RTMAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NXGPY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRTMAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NXGPY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- RTMAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NXGPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTMAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NXGPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RTMAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
NXGPY (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а -1.34% price change this week, while RTMAF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was +7.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.45%.
Reported Earning Dates
NXGPY is expected to report earnings on Apr 08, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+3.54% weekly)Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.
| NXGPY | RTMAF | NXGPY / RTMAF | |
| Capitalization | 11.5B | 119M | 9,664% |
| EBITDA | 1.11B | 92.9M | 1,198% |
| Gain YTD | 27.394 | -8.648 | -317% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.87 | 1.99 | 646% |
| Revenue | 5.03B | 812M | 620% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 69.4M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 96.5M | - |
NXGPY | RTMAF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RTMAF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as NXGPY (86). This means that RTMAF’s stock grew similarly to NXGPY’s over the last 12 months.
NXGPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTMAF (56). This means that NXGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RTMAF’s over the last 12 months.
NXGPY's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTMAF (88). This means that NXGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RTMAF’s over the last 12 months.
NXGPY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as RTMAF (60). This means that NXGPY’s stock grew similarly to RTMAF’s over the last 12 months.
RTMAF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as NXGPY (16). This means that RTMAF’s stock grew similarly to NXGPY’s over the last 12 months.
| NXGPY | RTMAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UMDD | 25.03 | 0.61 | +2.49% |
| ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | |||
| XMHQ | 104.25 | 1.71 | +1.67% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | |||
| SCHJ | 24.76 | 0.02 | +0.10% |
| Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| PZC | 6.04 | N/A | N/A |
| PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund III | |||
| CSNR | 27.19 | -0.11 | -0.42% |
| Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Act ETF | |||
NXGPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NXGPY and NXGPF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NXGPY and NXGPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NXGPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NXGPY | 100% | N/A | ||
| NXGPF - NXGPY | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RTMAF - NXGPY | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CURV - NXGPY | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| RROTF - NXGPY | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BZTAF - NXGPY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RTMAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RTMAF and BZTAF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTMAF and BZTAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RTMAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTMAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZTAF - RTMAF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NXGPY - RTMAF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RTMNF - RTMAF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AMKYF - RTMAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NXGPF - RTMAF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||