NYUKF
Price
$30.04
Change
-$4.96 (-14.17%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Capitalization
14.07B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
PCFBY
Price
$6.49
Change
+$0.13 (+2.04%)
Updated
Oct 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.66B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NYUKF vs PCFBY

Header iconNYUKF vs PCFBY Comparison
Open Charts NYUKF vs PCFBYBanner chart's image
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha
Price$30.04
Change-$4.96 (-14.17%)
Volume$130
Capitalization14.07B
Pacific Basin Shipping
Price$6.49
Change+$0.13 (+2.04%)
Volume$1.06K
Capitalization1.66B
NYUKF vs PCFBY Comparison Chart in %
NYUKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PCFBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NYUKF vs. PCFBY commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NYUKF is a Hold and PCFBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (NYUKF: $30.04 vs. PCFBY: $6.49)
Brand notoriety: NYUKF and PCFBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NYUKF: 39% vs. PCFBY: 29%
Market capitalization -- NYUKF: $14.07B vs. PCFBY: $1.66B
NYUKF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $14.07B. PCFBY’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $31.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NYUKF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePCFBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NYUKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PCFBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PCFBY is a better buy in the long-term than NYUKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NYUKF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCFBY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NYUKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PCFBY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCFBY is a better buy in the short-term than NYUKF.

Price Growth

NYUKF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PCFBY (@Marine Shipping) price change was +2.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+1.55% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NYUKF($14.1B) has a higher market cap than PCFBY($1.66B). PCFBY has higher P/E ratio than NYUKF: PCFBY (17.17) vs NYUKF (4.24). PCFBY YTD gains are higher at: 56.198 vs. NYUKF (-13.329). NYUKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 608B vs. PCFBY (313M). NYUKF has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. PCFBY (296M). PCFBY has less debt than NYUKF: PCFBY (310M) vs NYUKF (729B). NYUKF has higher revenues than PCFBY: NYUKF (2.54T) vs PCFBY (2.32B).
NYUKFPCFBYNYUKF / PCFBY
Capitalization14.1B1.66B849%
EBITDA608B313M194,249%
Gain YTD-13.32956.198-24%
P/E Ratio4.2417.1725%
Revenue2.54T2.32B109,357%
Total Cash145B296M48,986%
Total Debt729B310M235,161%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NYUKF vs PCFBY: Fundamental Ratings
NYUKF
PCFBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9338
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2841
SMR RATING
1..100
10087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9654
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NYUKF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as PCFBY (28). This means that NYUKF’s stock grew similarly to PCFBY’s over the last 12 months.

NYUKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as PCFBY (41). This means that NYUKF’s stock grew similarly to PCFBY’s over the last 12 months.

PCFBY's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as NYUKF (100). This means that PCFBY’s stock grew similarly to NYUKF’s over the last 12 months.

PCFBY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NYUKF (86). This means that PCFBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NYUKF’s over the last 12 months.

PCFBY's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NYUKF (96). This means that PCFBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NYUKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NYUKFPCFBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NYUKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PCFBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFYX15.920.01
+0.07%
SoFi Next 500 ETF
SJLD25.36N/A
N/A
SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF
JMBS45.97-0.01
-0.02%
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Sec ETF
CMDT27.39-0.14
-0.51%
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Act Exc-Trd Fd
PLTM15.46-1.02
-6.19%
GraniteShares Platinum Trust

NYUKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NYUKF and HHULY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NYUKF and HHULY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NYUKF
1D Price
Change %
NYUKF100%
N/A
HHULY - NYUKF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSLOF - NYUKF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSLOY - NYUKF
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
OROVF - NYUKF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAKKF - NYUKF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PCFBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCFBY and OROVY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCFBY and OROVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCFBY
1D Price
Change %
PCFBY100%
N/A
OROVY - PCFBY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPZZF - PCFBY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPNYY - PCFBY
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
NYUKF - PCFBY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OROVF - PCFBY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More