Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OALVX vs RMFCX
OALVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts OALVX vs RMFCX
Optimum Large Cap Value A
Price$20.35
Change+$0.04 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.20
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
OALVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OALVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OALVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. OALVX (1.92B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than OALVX: RMFCX (1.24) vs OALVX (0.76). OALVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: OALVX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). OALVX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. OALVX (11.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than OALVX: RMFCX (250) vs OALVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.56 vs. OALVX (2.73). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.44 vs. OALVX (33.44).
| OALVX | RMFCX | OALVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.91 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.91 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.141 | 13.116 | 77% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.24 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.73 | 7.56 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.18 | 33.69 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.44 | 60.44 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.27 | 96.24 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement