Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OALVX vs RMFCX
OALVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts OALVX vs RMFCX
Optimum Large Cap Value A
Price$20.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.57
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
OALVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OALVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OALVX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. OALVX (1.92B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than OALVX: RMFCX (1.26) vs OALVX (0.78). OALVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: OALVX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). OALVX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. OALVX (11.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than OALVX: RMFCX (250) vs OALVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. OALVX (3.04). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.21 vs. OALVX (30.28).
| OALVX | RMFCX | OALVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.91 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.91 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.816 | 11.642 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.26 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.04 | 6.98 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.66 | 29.24 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.28 | 54.21 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.54 | 91.22 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement