Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OANLX vs RWMHX
OANLX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts OANLX vs RWMHX
Oakmark Select Institutional
Price$83.75
Change+$0.52 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.61B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$65.89
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
OANLX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OANLX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OANLX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. OANLX (7.61B). RWMHX pays higher dividends than OANLX: RWMHX (1.33) vs OANLX (0.50). OANLX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: OANLX (9 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). OANLX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). OANLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than OANLX: RWMHX (250) vs OANLX (250000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.91 vs. OANLX (2.81). OANLX return over 5 years is better than : 91.66 vs. RWMHX (43.18).
| OANLX | RWMHX | OANLX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.41 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.41 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.635 | 8.429 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.61B | 204B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.33 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.81 | 3.91 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.19 | 29.08 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.66 | 43.18 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement