OBIIF vs OLO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OBIIF is a Hold and OLO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OBIIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOLO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- OBIIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- OLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OLO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- OLO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
OBIIF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OLO (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
OLO is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.81% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| OBIIF | OLO | OBIIF / OLO | |
| Capitalization | 14.7B | 889M | 1,654% |
| EBITDA | 63B | -47.56M | -132,461% |
| Gain YTD | -4.314 | -10.547 | 41% |
| P/E Ratio | 42.55 | 9.87 | 431% |
| Revenue | 97.3B | 228M | 42,675% |
| Total Cash | 149B | 363M | 41,047% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 18.9M | - |
OBIIF | OLO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 74 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OLO's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OBIIF (47). This means that OLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than OBIIF’s over the last 12 months.
OBIIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (97). This means that OBIIF’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.
OBIIF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OLO (89). This means that OBIIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OLO’s over the last 12 months.
OLO's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as OBIIF (53). This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to OBIIF’s over the last 12 months.
OBIIF's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as OLO (100). This means that OBIIF’s stock grew similarly to OLO’s over the last 12 months.
| OLO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HRINX | 47.82 | -0.32 | -0.66% |
| Harbor International Administrative | |||
| QBNAX | 34.19 | -0.70 | -2.01% |
| Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Instl | |||
| TBDAX | 19.19 | -0.46 | -2.34% |
| PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth A | |||
| FDGRX | 40.37 | -0.99 | -2.39% |
| Fidelity Growth Company Fund | |||
| FZFLX | 6.40 | -0.17 | -2.59% |
| Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index | |||
OBIIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OBIIF and PAYD have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OBIIF and PAYD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OBIIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OBIIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PAYD - OBIIF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BTQQF - OBIIF | 24% Poorly correlated | -10.51% | ||
| BTRCF - OBIIF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OLO - OBIIF | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.10% | ||
| KSFTF - OBIIF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
OLO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLO has been loosely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OLO jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OLO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLO | 100% | -3.10% | ||
| ACIW - OLO | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| COMP - OLO | 49% Loosely correlated | -8.18% | ||
| COIN - OLO | 46% Loosely correlated | -8.27% | ||
| TGL - OLO | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.96% | ||
| XYZ - OLO | 46% Loosely correlated | -17.69% | ||
More | ||||