Advertisement
OBIIF vs PAYD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OBIIF is a Hold and PAYD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OBIIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAYD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- OBIIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PAYD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OBIIF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAYD’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- OBIIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PAYD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
OBIIF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.88% price change this week, while PAYD (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.15%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-0.09% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| OBIIF | PAYD | OBIIF / PAYD | |
| Capitalization | 15.6B | 24.3M | 64,198% |
| EBITDA | 76.6B | -633.45K | -12,092,605% |
| Gain YTD | 15.587 | -3.333 | -468% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.14 | 86.67 | 41% |
| Revenue | 115B | 19.6M | 586,735% |
| Total Cash | 180B | 1.07M | 16,853,933% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 109K | - |
OBIIF | PAYD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 99 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 48 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OBIIF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAYD (72). This means that OBIIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAYD’s over the last 12 months.
PAYD's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as OBIIF (100). This means that PAYD’s stock grew similarly to OBIIF’s over the last 12 months.
OBIIF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAYD (95). This means that OBIIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAYD’s over the last 12 months.
OBIIF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as PAYD (59). This means that OBIIF’s stock grew similarly to PAYD’s over the last 12 months.
PAYD's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OBIIF (47). This means that PAYD’s stock grew somewhat faster than OBIIF’s over the last 12 months.
| OBIIF | PAYD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
Advertisement
OBIIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OBIIF and PAYD have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OBIIF and PAYD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OBIIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OBIIF | 100% | -7.58% | ||
| PAYD - OBIIF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
| BTQQF - OBIIF | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.22% | ||
| BTRCF - OBIIF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OLO - OBIIF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KSFTF - OBIIF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PAYD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PAYD and OBIIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PAYD and OBIIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAYD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAYD | 100% | -0.68% | ||
| OBIIF - PAYD | 25% Poorly correlated | -7.58% | ||
| PTRRF - PAYD | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HPTO - PAYD | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PLGGF - PAYD | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IGGGF - PAYD | 21% Poorly correlated | +9.62% | ||
More | ||||