OBT
Price
$23.36
Change
-$0.14 (-0.60%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
260.24M
76 days until earnings call
SBCF
Price
$27.45
Change
-$0.11 (-0.40%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.1B
77 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OBT vs SBCF

Header iconOBT vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts OBT vs SBCFBanner chart's image
Orange County Ban
Price$23.36
Change-$0.14 (-0.60%)
Volume$100
Capitalization260.24M
Seacoast Banking
Price$27.45
Change-$0.11 (-0.40%)
Volume$1.23K
Capitalization2.1B
OBT vs SBCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OBT vs. SBCF commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OBT is a StrongBuy and SBCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (OBT: $23.50 vs. SBCF: $27.55)
Brand notoriety: OBT and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OBT: 31% vs. SBCF: 171%
Market capitalization -- OBT: $260.24M vs. SBCF: $2.1B
OBT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $260.24M. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OBT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OBT is a better buy in the long-term than SBCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OBT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OBT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBCF is a better buy in the short-term than OBT.

Price Growth

OBT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -7.70% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

OBT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBCF($2.1B) has a higher market cap than OBT($260M). SBCF has higher P/E ratio than OBT: SBCF (20.13) vs OBT (8.94). SBCF YTD gains are higher at: 1.494 vs. OBT (-14.540). SBCF has higher revenues than OBT: SBCF (567M) vs OBT (102M).
OBTSBCFOBT / SBCF
Capitalization260M2.1B12%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-14.5401.494-973%
P/E Ratio8.9420.1344%
Revenue102M567M18%
Total CashN/A168M-
Total DebtN/A156M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OBT vs SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
OBT
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7554
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3658
SMR RATING
1..100
3817
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4163
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1139

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBCF's Valuation (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OBT (67) in the null industry. This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to OBT’s over the last 12 months.

OBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as SBCF (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OBT’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's SMR Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OBT (38) in the null industry. This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to OBT’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OBT (79) in the null industry. This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to OBT’s over the last 12 months.

OBT's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SBCF (63) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OBT’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OBTSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HISJF13.09N/A
N/A
H I S Co., Ltd.
HUSQF5.43N/A
N/A
Husqvarna AB
AUVGF0.07N/A
N/A
Australian Vintage Ltd.
VTXXF0.14N/A
N/A
Vertex Minerals Ltd.
ASHTF66.02-0.68
-1.02%
Ashtead Group PLC

SBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBCF
1D Price
Change %
SBCF100%
-1.75%
UBSI - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
UCB - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
ABCB - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
WSFS - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
TRMK - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
More