OBYCF
Price
$13.00
Change
-$0.20 (-1.52%)
Updated
Jan 10 closing price
Capitalization
9.18B
PNOCF
Price
$5.60
Change
-$0.41 (-6.82%)
Updated
Oct 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
Ad is loading...

OBYCF vs PNOCF

Header iconOBYCF vs PNOCF Comparison
Open Charts OBYCF vs PNOCFBanner chart's image
Obayashi
Price$13.00
Change-$0.20 (-1.52%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization9.18B
Penta Ocean Construction
Price$5.60
Change-$0.41 (-6.82%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.16B
OBYCF vs PNOCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
OBYCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OBYCF vs. PNOCF commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OBYCF is a Hold and PNOCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (OBYCF: $13.00 vs. PNOCF: $5.60)
Brand notoriety: OBYCF and PNOCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OBYCF: 60% vs. PNOCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- OBYCF: $9.18B vs. PNOCF: $1.16B
OBYCF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $9.18B. PNOCF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $1.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $5.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OBYCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNOCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OBYCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNOCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OBYCF is a better buy in the long-term than PNOCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OBYCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OBYCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

OBYCF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PNOCF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+4.42% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OBYCF($9.18B) has a higher market cap than PNOCF($1.16B). PNOCF has higher P/E ratio than OBYCF: PNOCF (49.85) vs OBYCF (14.42). PNOCF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. OBYCF (-1.515). OBYCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 179B vs. PNOCF (39.8B). OBYCF has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. PNOCF (54.2B). PNOCF has less debt than OBYCF: PNOCF (170B) vs OBYCF (379B). OBYCF has higher revenues than PNOCF: OBYCF (2.48T) vs PNOCF (667B).
OBYCFPNOCFOBYCF / PNOCF
Capitalization9.18B1.16B793%
EBITDA179B39.8B450%
Gain YTD-1.5150.000-
P/E Ratio14.4249.8529%
Revenue2.48T667B372%
Total Cash280B54.2B517%
Total Debt379B170B223%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OBYCF vs PNOCF: Fundamental Ratings
OBYCF
PNOCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
681
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4369
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OBYCF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNOCF (59). This means that OBYCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNOCF’s over the last 12 months.

PNOCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OBYCF (68). This means that PNOCF’s stock grew significantly faster than OBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

OBYCF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as PNOCF (100). This means that OBYCF’s stock grew similarly to PNOCF’s over the last 12 months.

OBYCF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as PNOCF (69). This means that OBYCF’s stock grew similarly to PNOCF’s over the last 12 months.

OBYCF's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as PNOCF (100). This means that OBYCF’s stock grew similarly to PNOCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OBYCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OBYCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOPCX15.380.18
+1.18%
Sterling Capital Special Opps C
JCNIX28.380.28
+1.00%
Janus Henderson Contrarian S
MOWIX16.610.13
+0.79%
Moerus Worldwide Value Institutional
HWNIX11.530.07
+0.61%
Hotchkis & Wiley International Value I
DLDCX39.580.21
+0.53%
BNY Mellon Natural Resources C

OBYCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OBYCF has been loosely correlated with IMPJY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OBYCF jumps, then IMPJY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OBYCF
1D Price
Change %
OBYCF100%
N/A
IMPJY - OBYCF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SNCAF - OBYCF
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
PNOCF - OBYCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RELT - OBYCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+7.98%
TISCY - OBYCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PNOCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNOCF and MLLUY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNOCF and MLLUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNOCF
1D Price
Change %
PNOCF100%
N/A
MLLUY - PNOCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SKBSY - PNOCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
SNCAF - PNOCF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
OBYCF - PNOCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTOBF - PNOCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More