OBYCF
Price
$15.15
Change
+$0.15 (+1.00%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.75B
RTOBF
Price
$3.60
Change
+$0.46 (+14.65%)
Updated
May 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.35B
Interact to see
Advertisement

OBYCF vs RTOBF

Header iconOBYCF vs RTOBF Comparison
Open Charts OBYCF vs RTOBFBanner chart's image
Obayashi
Price$15.15
Change+$0.15 (+1.00%)
Volume$283
Capitalization10.75B
Ratos AB
Price$3.60
Change+$0.46 (+14.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.35B
OBYCF vs RTOBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OBYCF vs. RTOBF commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OBYCF is a Hold and RTOBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (OBYCF: $15.15 vs. RTOBF: $3.60)
Brand notoriety: OBYCF and RTOBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OBYCF: 115% vs. RTOBF: 4%
Market capitalization -- OBYCF: $10.75B vs. RTOBF: $1.35B
OBYCF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $10.75B. RTOBF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $1.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OBYCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTOBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OBYCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RTOBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both OBYCF and RTOBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

OBYCF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -1.14% price change this week, while RTOBF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+1.19% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OBYCF($10.7B) has a higher market cap than RTOBF($1.35B). RTOBF has higher P/E ratio than OBYCF: RTOBF (23.48) vs OBYCF (12.57). OBYCF YTD gains are higher at: 14.773 vs. RTOBF (9.323). OBYCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 179B vs. RTOBF (3.61B). OBYCF has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. RTOBF (1.34B). RTOBF has less debt than OBYCF: RTOBF (9.12B) vs OBYCF (379B). OBYCF has higher revenues than RTOBF: OBYCF (2.48T) vs RTOBF (31.8B).
OBYCFRTOBFOBYCF / RTOBF
Capitalization10.7B1.35B792%
EBITDA179B3.61B4,960%
Gain YTD14.7739.323158%
P/E Ratio12.5723.4854%
Revenue2.48T31.8B7,811%
Total Cash280B1.34B20,911%
Total Debt379B9.12B4,156%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OBYCF vs RTOBF: Fundamental Ratings
OBYCF
RTOBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9740
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2790
SMR RATING
1..100
9882
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8210
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OBYCF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as RTOBF (62). This means that OBYCF’s stock grew similarly to RTOBF’s over the last 12 months.

OBYCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTOBF (90). This means that OBYCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RTOBF’s over the last 12 months.

RTOBF's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as OBYCF (98). This means that RTOBF’s stock grew similarly to OBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

RTOBF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as OBYCF (46). This means that RTOBF’s stock grew similarly to OBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

RTOBF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OBYCF (82). This means that RTOBF’s stock grew significantly faster than OBYCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAZWX24.600.07
+0.29%
Oakmark Global Select R6
BSPAX699.59N/A
N/A
iShares S&P 500 Index Investor A
LBDRX20.45N/A
N/A
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
MLVMX19.11N/A
N/A
MFS Low Volatility Equity R1
JHTAX19.18N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 3 A

OBYCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OBYCF has been loosely correlated with IMPJY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OBYCF jumps, then IMPJY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OBYCF
1D Price
Change %
OBYCF100%
N/A
IMPJY - OBYCF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SNCAF - OBYCF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
PNOCF - OBYCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TISCY - OBYCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTOBF - OBYCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RTOBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTOBF and FLR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTOBF and FLR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTOBF
1D Price
Change %
RTOBF100%
N/A
FLR - RTOBF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
SNCAF - RTOBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
SHMUF - RTOBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNOCF - RTOBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TISCY - RTOBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More