It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTOTDY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOTDY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
OC (@Building Products) experienced а -6.62% price change this week, while TOTDY (@Building Products) price change was -4.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.85%.
OC is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
TOTDY is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
OC | TOTDY | OC / TOTDY | |
Capitalization | 14.5B | 5.25B | 276% |
EBITDA | 2.28B | 65.6B | 3% |
Gain YTD | 17.137 | -6.702 | -256% |
P/E Ratio | 12.85 | 18.48 | 69% |
Revenue | 9.68B | 692B | 1% |
Total Cash | 1.62B | 98.1B | 2% |
Total Debt | 3.27B | 24.7B | 13% |
OC | TOTDY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TOTDY's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as OC (31) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TOTDY’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.
OC's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for TOTDY (100) in the null industry. This means that OC’s stock grew significantly faster than TOTDY’s over the last 12 months.
TOTDY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OC (48) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TOTDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.
OC's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as TOTDY (62) in the null industry. This means that OC’s stock grew similarly to TOTDY’s over the last 12 months.
OC's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TOTDY (89) in the null industry. This means that OC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TOTDY’s over the last 12 months.
OC | TOTDY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 2 days ago63% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 2 days ago61% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 2 days ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 2 days ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 2 days ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 21 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago57% | 2 days ago62% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 2 days ago50% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 2 days ago54% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOTDY has been loosely correlated with DKILY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOTDY jumps, then DKILY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOTDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TOTDY | 100% | -0.62% | ||
DKILY - TOTDY | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
TOTDF - TOTDY | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
JSGRY - TOTDY | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
JCI - TOTDY | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
OC - TOTDY | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
More |