OCCIO
Price
$24.92
Change
-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Updated
Nov 19, 03:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OFS
Price
$4.97
Change
-$0.15 (-2.93%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
66.72M
99 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OCCIO vs OFS

Header iconOCCIO vs OFS Comparison
Open Charts OCCIO vs OFSBanner chart's image
OFS Credit
Price$24.92
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Volume$333
CapitalizationN/A
OFS Capital
Price$4.97
Change-$0.15 (-2.93%)
Volume$515
Capitalization66.72M
OCCIO vs OFS Comparison Chart in %
OCCIO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCCIO vs. OFS commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCCIO is a Hold and OFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (OCCIO: $24.96 vs. OFS: $5.10)
Brand notoriety: OCCIO and OFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCCIO: 145% vs. OFS: 50%
Market capitalization -- OCCIO: $0 vs. OFS: $66.72M
OCCIO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. OFS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $66.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $157.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCCIO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OCCIO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OFS is a better buy in the long-term than OCCIO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCCIO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OCCIO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OCCIO is a better buy in the short-term than OFS.

Price Growth

OCCIO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while OFS (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

OFS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.52% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCCIO YTD gains are higher at: 7.415 vs. OFS (-30.828). OFS has more cash in the bank: 45.3M vs. OCCIO (16.8M). OFS has higher revenues than OCCIO: OFS (8.01M) vs OCCIO (3.8M).
OCCIOOFSOCCIO / OFS
CapitalizationN/A66.7M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.415-30.828-24%
P/E RatioN/A20.75-
Revenue3.8M8.01M47%
Total Cash16.8M45.3M37%
Total DebtN/A236M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OFS: Fundamental Ratings
OFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58
SMR RATING
1..100
81
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCCIOOFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
1%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
1%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OCCIO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AOS63.610.23
+0.36%
AO Smith Corp
BDL30.91N/A
N/A
Flanigan's Enterprises
ISRLU12.40N/A
N/A
Israel Acquisitions Corp
DFH17.77-0.19
-1.06%
Dream Finders Homes
CMRC4.41-0.05
-1.12%
Commerce.com Inc

OCCIO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCCIO has been loosely correlated with EICB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCCIO jumps, then EICB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCCIO
1D Price
Change %
OCCIO100%
-0.16%
EICB - OCCIO
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
CCIA - OCCIO
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OXLCO - OCCIO
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
OXLCN - OCCIO
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
OFS - OCCIO
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
More

OFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OFS has been loosely correlated with NEWT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OFS jumps, then NEWT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OFS
1D Price
Change %
OFS100%
-2.73%
NEWT - OFS
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
PFLT - OFS
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
PNNT - OFS
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
SLRC - OFS
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
OCSL - OFS
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
More