OCDGF
Price
$4.79
Change
+$0.04 (+0.84%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.41B
TSCDY
Price
$18.10
Change
+$0.23 (+1.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
38.28B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OCDGF vs TSCDY

Header iconOCDGF vs TSCDY Comparison
Open Charts OCDGF vs TSCDYBanner chart's image
Ocado Group
Price$4.79
Change+$0.04 (+0.84%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization3.41B
Tes
Price$18.10
Change+$0.23 (+1.29%)
Volume$57.34K
Capitalization38.28B
OCDGF vs TSCDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OCDGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSCDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCDGF vs. TSCDY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCDGF is a Buy and TSCDY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (OCDGF: $4.79 vs. TSCDY: $18.10)
Brand notoriety: OCDGF and TSCDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCDGF: 201% vs. TSCDY: 35%
Market capitalization -- OCDGF: $3.41B vs. TSCDY: $38.28B
OCDGF [@Food Retail] is valued at $3.41B. TSCDY’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $38.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $48.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCDGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTSCDY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • OCDGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TSCDY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSCDY is a better buy in the long-term than OCDGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCDGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSCDY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OCDGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TSCDY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSCDY is a better buy in the short-term than OCDGF.

Price Growth

OCDGF (@Food Retail) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TSCDY (@Food Retail) price change was +4.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

TSCDY is expected to report earnings on Oct 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (-0.34% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCDY($38.3B) has a higher market cap than OCDGF($3.41B). OCDGF has higher P/E ratio than TSCDY: OCDGF (62.41) vs TSCDY (19.41). TSCDY (32.263) and OCDGF (31.593) have similar YTD gains . TSCDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.77B vs. OCDGF (177M). TSCDY has higher revenues than OCDGF: TSCDY (69.9B) vs OCDGF (1.29B).
OCDGFTSCDYOCDGF / TSCDY
Capitalization3.41B38.3B9%
EBITDA177M4.77B4%
Gain YTD31.59332.26398%
P/E Ratio62.4119.41322%
Revenue1.29B69.9B2%
Total Cash756MN/A-
Total Debt1.8BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCDGF vs TSCDY: Fundamental Ratings
OCDGF
TSCDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3379
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10023
SMR RATING
1..100
5097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10025
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TSCDY's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OCDGF (74). This means that TSCDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than OCDGF’s over the last 12 months.

TSCDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OCDGF (100). This means that TSCDY’s stock grew significantly faster than OCDGF’s over the last 12 months.

OCDGF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TSCDY (97). This means that OCDGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TSCDY’s over the last 12 months.

OCDGF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as TSCDY (46). This means that OCDGF’s stock grew similarly to TSCDY’s over the last 12 months.

TSCDY's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OCDGF (100). This means that TSCDY’s stock grew significantly faster than OCDGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCDGFTSCDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OCDGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSCDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANEFX71.220.54
+0.76%
American Funds New Economy A
PYVSX17.27N/A
N/A
Payden Equity Income SI
FBFQX12.78N/A
N/A
Franklin Managed Income R
AGCTX21.37N/A
N/A
American Century Global Small Cap R6
ARSZX10.48N/A
N/A
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Z

OCDGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCDGF has been loosely correlated with OCDDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCDGF jumps, then OCDDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCDGF
1D Price
Change %
OCDGF100%
N/A
OCDDY - OCDGF
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.29%
KKOYF - OCDGF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVNDY - OCDGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
SVNDF - OCDGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSCDY - OCDGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
More

TSCDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSCDY has been loosely correlated with JSAIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSCDY jumps, then JSAIY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSCDY
1D Price
Change %
TSCDY100%
+1.29%
JSAIY - TSCDY
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.36%
CRRFY - TSCDY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ADRNY - TSCDY
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
TSCDF - TSCDY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
NGVC - TSCDY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
More