OCDGF vs TSCDY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCDGF is a Hold and TSCDY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OCDGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTSCDY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- OCDGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TSCDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TSCDY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- TSCDY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
OCDGF (@Food Retail) experienced а -5.54% price change this week, while TSCDY (@Food Retail) price change was -4.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
TSCDY is expected to report earnings on Apr 10, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food Retail (-2.53% weekly)The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.
| OCDGF | TSCDY | OCDGF / TSCDY | |
| Capitalization | 9.98B | 23.7B | 42% |
| EBITDA | -94.7M | 3.35B | -3% |
| Gain YTD | 3.022 | 1.997 | 151% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 25.38 | - |
| Revenue | 2.62B | 65.8B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 1.01B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.91B | N/A | - |
OCDGF | TSCDY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TSCDY's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as OCDGF (39). This means that TSCDY’s stock grew similarly to OCDGF’s over the last 12 months.
TSCDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OCDGF (100). This means that TSCDY’s stock grew significantly faster than OCDGF’s over the last 12 months.
OCDGF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as TSCDY (98). This means that OCDGF’s stock grew similarly to TSCDY’s over the last 12 months.
TSCDY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as OCDGF (63). This means that TSCDY’s stock grew similarly to OCDGF’s over the last 12 months.
TSCDY's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OCDGF (100). This means that TSCDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than OCDGF’s over the last 12 months.
| TSCDY | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% |
OCDGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCDGF has been loosely correlated with OCDDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OCDGF jumps, then OCDDY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OCDGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCDGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OCDDY - OCDGF | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| KKOYF - OCDGF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SVNDY - OCDGF | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.80% | ||
| SVNDF - OCDGF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TSCDY - OCDGF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
More | ||||
TSCDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSCDY has been loosely correlated with JSAIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSCDY jumps, then JSAIY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSCDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSCDY | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| JSAIY - TSCDY | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| CRRFY - TSCDY | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| ADRNY - TSCDY | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| TSCDF - TSCDY | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NGVC - TSCDY | 22% Poorly correlated | -9.78% | ||
More | ||||