OCGPF
Price
$2.65
Change
-$0.45 (-14.52%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
480.5M
PRBZF
Price
$60.80
Change
+$0.80 (+1.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

OCGPF vs PRBZF

Header iconOCGPF vs PRBZF Comparison
Open Charts OCGPF vs PRBZFBanner chart's image
Oceana Group
Price$2.65
Change-$0.45 (-14.52%)
Volume$125
Capitalization480.5M
Premium Brands Holding
Price$60.80
Change+$0.80 (+1.33%)
Volume$4.31K
Capitalization2.98B
OCGPF vs PRBZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OCGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRBZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCGPF vs. PRBZF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCGPF is a Hold and PRBZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (OCGPF: $2.65 vs. PRBZF: $60.80)
Brand notoriety: OCGPF and PRBZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCGPF: 84% vs. PRBZF: 73%
Market capitalization -- OCGPF: $480.5M vs. PRBZF: $2.98B
OCGPF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $480.5M. PRBZF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCGPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRBZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OCGPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRBZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both OCGPF and PRBZF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCGPF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRBZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OCGPF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PRBZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OCGPF is a better buy in the short-term than PRBZF.

Price Growth

OCGPF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PRBZF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +3.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.77% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRBZF($2.98B) has a higher market cap than OCGPF($480M). PRBZF has higher P/E ratio than OCGPF: PRBZF (37.77) vs OCGPF (14.35). PRBZF YTD gains are higher at: 9.871 vs. OCGPF (-24.286). OCGPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.57B vs. PRBZF (447M). OCGPF has more cash in the bank: 728M vs. PRBZF (13.8M). PRBZF has less debt than OCGPF: PRBZF (2.39B) vs OCGPF (3.84B). OCGPF has higher revenues than PRBZF: OCGPF (9.6B) vs PRBZF (5.46B).
OCGPFPRBZFOCGPF / PRBZF
Capitalization480M2.98B16%
EBITDA1.57B447M351%
Gain YTD-24.2869.871-246%
P/E Ratio14.3537.7738%
Revenue9.6B5.46B176%
Total Cash728M13.8M5,275%
Total Debt3.84B2.39B160%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCGPF vs PRBZF: Fundamental Ratings
OCGPF
PRBZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9679
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5386
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCGPF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as PRBZF (21). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew similarly to PRBZF’s over the last 12 months.

OCGPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PRBZF (100). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew similarly to PRBZF’s over the last 12 months.

PRBZF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as OCGPF (96). This means that PRBZF’s stock grew similarly to OCGPF’s over the last 12 months.

PRBZF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as OCGPF (82). This means that PRBZF’s stock grew similarly to OCGPF’s over the last 12 months.

OCGPF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRBZF (86). This means that OCGPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRBZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCGPFPRBZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OCGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRBZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCMGX20.050.34
+1.73%
Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth C
INSIX24.460.39
+1.62%
Catalyst Insider Buying I
MFCIX41.560.40
+0.97%
Meridian Contrarian Investor
FIGCX21.150.07
+0.33%
Fidelity Advisor International Growth C
BIERX25.93-0.01
-0.04%
Brandes International Equity R6

OCGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OCGPF and PRBZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCGPF and PRBZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCGPF
1D Price
Change %
OCGPF100%
N/A
PRBZF - OCGPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
TUFBY - OCGPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSLYF - OCGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+8.96%
IMG - OCGPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RRSFF - OCGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PRBZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRBZF and OCGPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRBZF and OCGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRBZF
1D Price
Change %
PRBZF100%
+1.34%
OCGPF - PRBZF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRPT - PRBZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
SAPIF - PRBZF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
RSGUF - PRBZF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
SGLJF - PRBZF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More