OEC
Price
$17.69
Change
+$0.21 (+1.20%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
11 days until earnings call
TYNPF
Price
$34.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Ad is loading...

OEC vs TYNPF

Header iconOEC vs TYNPF Comparison
Open Charts OEC vs TYNPFBanner chart's image
Orion SA
Price$17.69
Change+$0.21 (+1.20%)
Volume$294.19K
CapitalizationN/A
Nippon Sanso Holdings
Price$34.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$182
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
OEC vs TYNPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
OEC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
OEC vs. TYNPF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OEC is a Buy and TYNPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (OEC: $17.69 vs. TYNPF: $36.15)
Brand notoriety: OEC and TYNPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OEC: 59% vs. TYNPF: 40%
Market capitalization -- OEC: $1.36B vs. TYNPF: $10.55B
OEC [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $1.36B. TYNPF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $10.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OEC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTYNPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OEC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TYNPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OEC is a better buy in the long-term than TYNPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OEC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OEC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

OEC (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +4.92% price change this week, while TYNPF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +9.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

OEC is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.25% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TYNPF($10.6B) has a higher market cap than OEC($1.36B). TYNPF has higher P/E ratio than OEC: TYNPF (20.28) vs OEC (13.52). TYNPF YTD gains are higher at: 34.579 vs. OEC (-36.031). TYNPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 227B vs. OEC (327M). TYNPF has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. OEC (37.5M). OEC has less debt than TYNPF: OEC (927M) vs TYNPF (900B). TYNPF has higher revenues than OEC: TYNPF (1.19T) vs OEC (1.89B).
OECTYNPFOEC / TYNPF
Capitalization1.36B10.6B13%
EBITDA327M227B0%
Gain YTD-36.03134.579-104%
P/E Ratio13.5220.2867%
Revenue1.89B1.19T0%
Total Cash37.5M155B0%
Total Debt927M900B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OEC: Fundamental Ratings
OEC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
19
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OEC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OEC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

OEC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OEC has been closely correlated with CBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OEC jumps, then CBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OEC
1D Price
Change %
OEC100%
+1.20%
CBT - OEC
71%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
ECVT - OEC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
AVNT - OEC
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
EMN - OEC
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
WLK - OEC
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
More

TYNPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TYNPF and CBT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TYNPF and CBT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TYNPF
1D Price
Change %
TYNPF100%
-0.96%
CBT - TYNPF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
AVNT - TYNPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
OEC - TYNPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
GPHBF - TYNPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.89%
TROX - TYNPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
More