Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OFALX vs RMEBX
OFALX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts OFALX vs RMEBX
Olstein All Cap Value C
Price$18.64
Change+$0.10 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets488.41M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
OFALX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OFALX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OFALX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. OFALX (488M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than OFALX: RMEBX (1.05) vs OFALX (0.32). OFALX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: OFALX (30 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). OFALX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). OFALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than OFALX: RMEBX (250) vs OFALX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.54 vs. OFALX (-11.05). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.54 vs. OFALX (-1.33).
| OFALX | RMEBX | OFALX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.07 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.07 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.374 | 13.233 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 488M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.05 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.05 | 4.54 | -243% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.36 | 37.83 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.33 | 55.54 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.38 | 88.87 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement