Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OFALX vs RMEBX
OFALX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts OFALX vs RMEBX
Olstein All Cap Value C
Price$18.02
Change-$0.06 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets486.9M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.96B
OFALX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OFALX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OFALX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. OFALX (487M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than OFALX: RMEBX (1.11) vs OFALX (0.33). OFALX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: OFALX (30 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). OFALX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. OFALX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than OFALX: RMEBX (250) vs OFALX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. OFALX (-5.73). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.78 vs. OFALX (0.75).
| OFALX | RMEBX | OFALX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.07 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.07 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.166 | 9.513 | -2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 487M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.11 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.73 | 9.12 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.71 | 21.70 | -49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.75 | 51.78 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.11 | 76.00 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers