Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OFALX vs RMEBX
OFALX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts OFALX vs RMEBX
Olstein All Cap Value C
Price$18.49
Change-$0.20 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets494.92M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.24
Change-$0.49 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.34B
OFALX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OFALX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OFALX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. OFALX (495M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than OFALX: RMEBX (1.09) vs OFALX (0.32). OFALX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: OFALX (30 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). OFALX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. OFALX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than OFALX: RMEBX (250) vs OFALX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. OFALX (-7.41). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 61.00 vs. OFALX (6.51).
| OFALX | RMEBX | OFALX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.07 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.07 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.203 | 12.407 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 495M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.09 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.41 | 5.89 | -126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.35 | 39.94 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.51 | 61.00 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.23 | 101.18 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement