Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OFALX vs RMEBX
OFALX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts OFALX vs RMEBX
Olstein All Cap Value C
Price$18.95
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets505.6M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.77
Change-$0.12 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.45B
OFALX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OFALX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OFALX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. OFALX (506M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than OFALX: RMEBX (1.09) vs OFALX (0.32). OFALX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: OFALX (30 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). OFALX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. OFALX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than OFALX: RMEBX (250) vs OFALX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.44 vs. OFALX (-5.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.79 vs. OFALX (3.42).
| OFALX | RMEBX | OFALX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.07 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.07 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.638 | 11.289 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 506M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.09 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.98 | 6.44 | -93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.72 | 29.80 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.42 | 52.79 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.03 | 94.29 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement