OFSTF
Price
$0.31
Change
+$0.01 (+3.33%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
234.77M
19 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$18.55
Change
+$0.09 (+0.49%)
Updated
Apr 25, 02:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.65B
6 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OFSTF vs OWL

Header iconOFSTF vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts OFSTF vs OWLBanner chart's image
Carbon Streaming
Price$0.31
Change+$0.01 (+3.33%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization234.77M
Blue Owl Capital
Price$18.55
Change+$0.09 (+0.49%)
Volume$3.8K
Capitalization8.65B
OFSTF vs OWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OFSTF vs. OWL commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OFSTF is a Hold and OWL is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (OFSTF: $0.31 vs. OWL: $18.47)
Brand notoriety: OFSTF and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OFSTF: 4% vs. OWL: 101%
Market capitalization -- OFSTF: $234.77M vs. OWL: $8.65B
OFSTF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $234.77M. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OFSTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OFSTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OFSTF is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OWL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OWL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

OFSTF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.58% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +6.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

OFSTF is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.96% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($8.65B) has a higher market cap than OFSTF($235M). OWL has higher P/E ratio than OFSTF: OWL (185.70) vs OFSTF (117.65). OFSTF YTD gains are higher at: -15.250 vs. OWL (-19.997). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 633M vs. OFSTF (-6.13M). OFSTF has more cash in the bank: 134M vs. OWL (104M). OFSTF has less debt than OWL: OFSTF (67.6K) vs OWL (2B). OWL has higher revenues than OFSTF: OWL (1.73B) vs OFSTF (0).
OFSTFOWLOFSTF / OWL
Capitalization235M8.65B3%
EBITDA-6.13M633M-1%
Gain YTD-15.250-19.99776%
P/E Ratio117.65185.7063%
Revenue01.73B-
Total Cash134M104M129%
Total Debt67.6K2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OFSTF: Fundamental Ratings
OFSTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AREN4.581.22
+36.31%
Arena Group Holdings (The)
UROY1.870.09
+5.06%
Uranium Royalty Corp
AXON590.6713.77
+2.39%
Axon Enterprise
FNB13.410.23
+1.75%
FNB Corp
FDP34.680.40
+1.17%
Fresh Del Monte Produce

OFSTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OFSTF and TEKCF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OFSTF and TEKCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OFSTF
1D Price
Change %
OFSTF100%
+1.70%
TEKCF - OFSTF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VINP - OFSTF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
AGNMF - OFSTF
7%
Poorly correlated
+15.64%
JTCPF - OFSTF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OWL - OFSTF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.53%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+4.53%
ARES - OWL
83%
Closely correlated
+4.81%
KKR - OWL
82%
Closely correlated
+6.03%
APO - OWL
81%
Closely correlated
+5.35%
CG - OWL
78%
Closely correlated
+6.01%
BX - OWL
76%
Closely correlated
+5.94%
More