OFSTF
Price
$0.40
Change
-$0.01 (-2.44%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
234.77M
VINP
Price
$9.76
Change
+$0.08 (+0.83%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
607.7M
51 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OFSTF vs VINP

Header iconOFSTF vs VINP Comparison
Open Charts OFSTF vs VINPBanner chart's image
Carbon Streaming
Price$0.40
Change-$0.01 (-2.44%)
Volume$14.27K
Capitalization234.77M
Vinci Partners Investments
Price$9.76
Change+$0.08 (+0.83%)
Volume$50.49K
Capitalization607.7M
OFSTF vs VINP Comparison Chart
Loading...
OFSTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OFSTF vs. VINP commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OFSTF is a Hold and VINP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (OFSTF: $0.40 vs. VINP: $9.76)
Brand notoriety: OFSTF and VINP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OFSTF: 69% vs. VINP: 62%
Market capitalization -- OFSTF: $234.77M vs. VINP: $607.7M
OFSTF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $234.77M. VINP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $607.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OFSTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVINP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OFSTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VINP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VINP is a better buy in the long-term than OFSTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OFSTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OFSTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • VINP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OFSTF is a better buy in the short-term than VINP.

Price Growth

OFSTF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.14% price change this week, while VINP (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

OFSTF is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2024.

VINP is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VINP($608M) has a higher market cap than OFSTF($235M). OFSTF has higher P/E ratio than VINP: OFSTF (117.65) vs VINP (13.92). OFSTF YTD gains are higher at: 10.986 vs. VINP (-3.078). VINP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 289M vs. OFSTF (-6.13M). VINP has higher revenues than OFSTF: VINP (608M) vs OFSTF (0).
OFSTFVINPOFSTF / VINP
Capitalization235M608M39%
EBITDA-6.13M289M-2%
Gain YTD10.986-3.078-357%
P/E Ratio117.6513.92845%
Revenue0608M-
Total Cash134MN/A-
Total Debt67.6KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OFSTF: Fundamental Ratings
OFSTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OFSTFVINP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OFSTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSAK5.280.16
+3.07%
Lesaka Technologies
GDHG2.300.04
+1.77%
Golden Heaven Group Holdings Ltd
CC19.400.31
+1.62%
Chemours Company (The)
SASR33.870.21
+0.62%
Sandy Spring Bancorp
MTB196.760.66
+0.34%
M&T Bank Corp

OFSTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OFSTF and TEKCF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OFSTF and TEKCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OFSTF
1D Price
Change %
OFSTF100%
-2.45%
TEKCF - OFSTF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VINP - OFSTF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
AGNMF - OFSTF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
JTCPF - OFSTF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OWL - OFSTF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
More

VINP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VINP has been loosely correlated with PAX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VINP jumps, then PAX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VINP
1D Price
Change %
VINP100%
+0.83%
PAX - VINP
45%
Loosely correlated
+4.95%
TROW - VINP
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
SEIC - VINP
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
JHG - VINP
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
BAM - VINP
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
More