OGIG
Price
$47.67
Change
-$1.77 (-3.58%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:44 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
117.46M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLK
Price
$196.25
Change
-$1.96 (-0.99%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
129.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OGIG vs XLK

Header iconOGIG vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts OGIG vs XLKBanner chart's image
OGIG vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) vs. State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK)

Key Takeaways

  • OGIG is a thematic, rules-based ETF targeting global internet and e-commerce giants with quality and growth screens, while XLK is a passive ETF tracking the broad U.S. technology sector via market-cap weighting.
  • OGIG holds approximately 57 securities with an expense ratio of 0.48%, offering concentrated exposure to internet-driven companies; XLK holds a larger basket of roughly 70 technology stocks with a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.08%.
  • Both ETFs feature heavy overlap in top holdings such as Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta Platforms, but XLK emphasizes broader technology exposure including semiconductors and hardware leaders like NVIDIA and Apple.
  • OGIG's strategy incorporates fundamental screens for revenue derivation from internet segments and financial sustainability metrics, resulting in a more selective, growth-oriented profile compared to XLK's sector-replication approach.
  • XLK generally provides greater liquidity and lower costs, making it suitable for core technology allocations, whereas OGIG delivers targeted thematic exposure suited to investors seeking internet and e-commerce themes.
  • In recent market cycles, relative performance has been driven by sector rotation favoring large-cap technology leaders, with both funds sensitive to interest rate expectations and earnings momentum in mega-cap holdings.

Introduction

Investors seeking technology exposure often compare specialized thematic funds with broad sector ETFs. The ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) and the State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) both provide access to leading technology companies but pursue distinct strategies. OGIG narrows its focus to global internet and e-commerce leaders screened for growth and quality characteristics, while XLK delivers diversified exposure across the entire U.S. technology sector. This comparison highlights structural differences that influence diversification, cost efficiency, and alignment with specific investment objectives in the current environment of artificial intelligence adoption and digital transformation.

ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) Overview

The ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) seeks to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index. This rules-based index selects companies deriving at least 50% of revenues from internet technology or e-commerce segments, applying additional screens for gross margins and cash-burn sustainability. The fund typically holds around 57 securities, with the top 10 representing approximately 45% of assets. Leading positions often include Amazon.com Inc., Alphabet Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Meta Platforms Inc. Sector allocations concentrate in technology and communication services. OGIG maintains an expense ratio of 0.48% and employs a fundamental weighting methodology with periodic rebalancing. As a passively managed thematic ETF, it offers targeted exposure distinct from broad market or sector benchmarks.

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) Overview

The State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) seeks to provide investment results that, before expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Index. This market-capitalization-weighted index includes U.S. companies classified in the technology sector under the Global Industry Classification Standard. The fund holds approximately 70 securities, with the top 10 accounting for roughly 60% of assets. Prominent holdings frequently feature NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Broadcom Inc. Allocations are overwhelmingly in information technology, with minor exposure to communication services. XLK carries an expense ratio of 0.08% and follows a passive replication strategy with quarterly rebalancing aligned to index changes. As a sector ETF, it provides broad, cost-efficient access to the U.S. technology landscape.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from structural tailwinds including artificial intelligence infrastructure buildout, cloud computing expansion, and digital advertising growth. Capital flows have favored companies with scalable platforms and strong balance sheets amid evolving interest rate expectations. Regulatory scrutiny around data privacy, antitrust, and semiconductor export controls remains a key risk factor for both domestic and global technology firms. Macroeconomic drivers such as corporate capital expenditure trends and consumer digital spending patterns influence earnings visibility across internet and hardware segments. Sector rotation dynamics and geopolitical developments affecting supply chains add layers of complexity to positioning within technology exposure.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have reflected strength in mega-cap technology names driven by artificial intelligence-related earnings momentum and capital spending cycles. XLK's broader sector mandate has provided participation across hardware, software, and semiconductor sub-industries, contributing to relative stability during rotations favoring established leaders. OGIG's narrower internet-giants focus has amplified exposure to e-commerce and digital platform growth but introduced greater sensitivity to consumer spending trends and advertising cycles. Volatility differences arise from concentration levels and thematic purity, with XLK generally exhibiting characteristics of a large-cap technology benchmark and OGIG displaying traits of a more selective growth strategy. Relative positioning depends on investor views regarding the durability of internet revenue streams versus broader technology innovation.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the technology sector, higher liquidity profile, and alignment with sustained sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would assign a modestly higher probability of favor to the State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) for investors seeking core technology exposure in the current environment. The ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) remains a compelling option for those prioritizing thematic internet and e-commerce concentration with explicit quality screens.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
OGIG vs. XLK commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OGIG is a Buy and XLK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 129B vs. OGIG (117M). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than OGIG: XLK (36.468) vs OGIG (-9.209). OGIG was incepted earlier than XLK: OGIG (8 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than OGIG (0.48). OGIG has a higher turnover XLK (5.00) vs XLK (5.00).
OGIGXLKOGIG / XLK
Gain YTD-9.20936.468-25%
Net Assets117M129B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.480.08600%
Turnover37.005.00740%
Yield0.080.4020%
Fund Existence8 years27 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OGIGXLK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OGIG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWHQX39.76N/A
N/A
Nationwide Bailard Technology M
MKVEX18.59N/A
N/A
MFS International Large Cap Value R2
TRGPX20.85N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth Premier
ESIGX17.89N/A
N/A
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG Ins
BIOPX59.27-0.79
-1.32%
Baron Opportunity Retail

OGIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OGIG has been closely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OGIG jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OGIG
1D Price
Change %
OGIG100%
-3.46%
SHOP - OGIG
68%
Closely correlated
-3.48%
CRWD - OGIG
66%
Closely correlated
-2.78%
MSFT - OGIG
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.17%
SNOW - OGIG
64%
Loosely correlated
-7.61%
IOT - OGIG
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
More

XLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLK
1D Price
Change %
XLK100%
-1.00%
NOW - XLK
97%
Closely correlated
-7.64%
QRVO - XLK
69%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
MA - XLK
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
V - XLK
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
BR - XLK
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
More