OILFF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.62M
OMID
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
39 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OILFF vs OMID

Header iconOILFF vs OMID Comparison
Open Charts OILFF vs OMIDBanner chart's image
NEXTLEAF SOLUTIONS
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.83K
Capitalization6.62M
Omid
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.03K
CapitalizationN/A
OILFF vs OMID Comparison Chart
Loading...
OILFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OILFF vs. OMID commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OILFF is a Hold and OMID is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (OILFF: $0.05 vs. OMID: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: OILFF and OMID are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OILFF: 15% vs. OMID: 24%
Market capitalization -- OILFF: $6.62M vs. OMID: $0
OILFF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $6.62M. OMID’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OILFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMID’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OILFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OMID’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both OILFF and OMID are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OILFF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMID’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OILFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OMID’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMID is a better buy in the short-term than OILFF.

Price Growth

OILFF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -4.48% price change this week, while OMID (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +2.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMID is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.30% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMID YTD gains are higher at: 11.899 vs. OILFF (-2.157).
OILFFOMIDOILFF / OMID
Capitalization6.62MN/A-
EBITDA-1.66MN/A-
Gain YTD-2.15711.899-18%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue5.48MN/A-
Total Cash409KN/A-
Total Debt575KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OILFF vs OMID: Fundamental Ratings
OILFF
OMID
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
431
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
901
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5658
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2473
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OILFF's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as OMID (88). This means that OILFF’s stock grew similarly to OMID’s over the last 12 months.

OMID's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as OILFF (100). This means that OMID’s stock grew similarly to OILFF’s over the last 12 months.

OMID's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OILFF (90). This means that OMID’s stock grew significantly faster than OILFF’s over the last 12 months.

OILFF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as OMID (58). This means that OILFF’s stock grew similarly to OMID’s over the last 12 months.

OILFF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMID (73). This means that OILFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OILFFOMID
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OILFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FWATX14.560.11
+0.76%
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income A
RMCFX10.910.06
+0.55%
Royce Micro-Cap Svc
MPMCX14.850.06
+0.41%
BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy M
PMBCX35.63N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap C
TNXAX10.34N/A
N/A
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income A

OILFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OILFF and RDY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OILFF and RDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OILFF
1D Price
Change %
OILFF100%
-7.20%
RDY - OILFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
OMID - OILFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.33%
MVMDF - OILFF
7%
Poorly correlated
-15.87%
PCLOF - OILFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDVAF - OILFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMID and OWPC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMID and OWPC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMID
1D Price
Change %
OMID100%
-4.33%
OWPC - OMID
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
OILFF - OMID
9%
Poorly correlated
-7.20%
NXSCF - OMID
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGEDF - OMID
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCYN - OMID
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More