OLKR
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
12.14M
SKYC
Price
$0.77
Change
+$0.08 (+11.59%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

OLKR vs SKYC

Header iconOLKR vs SKYC Comparison
Open Charts OLKR vs SKYCBanner chart's image
OpenLocker Holdings
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.31K
Capitalization12.14M
Sky Constant Century
Price$0.77
Change+$0.08 (+11.59%)
Volume$320
CapitalizationN/A
OLKR vs SKYC Comparison Chart
Loading...
OLKR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKYC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OLKR vs. SKYC commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OLKR is a Hold and SKYC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (OLKR: $0.11 vs. SKYC: $0.77)
Brand notoriety: OLKR and SKYC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OLKR: 94% vs. SKYC: 16%
Market capitalization -- OLKR: $12.14M vs. SKYC: $0
OLKR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $12.14M. SKYC’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OLKR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSKYC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OLKR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SKYC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SKYC is a better buy in the long-term than OLKR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OLKR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKYC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OLKR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SKYC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SKYC is a better buy in the short-term than OLKR.

Price Growth

OLKR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.09% price change this week, while SKYC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +18.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

OLKR is expected to report earnings on Jun 14, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+18.48% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKYC YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. OLKR (-13.846).
OLKRSKYCOLKR / SKYC
Capitalization12.1MN/A-
EBITDA-2.55MN/A-
Gain YTD-13.8460.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue62.3KN/A-
Total Cash201KN/A-
Total Debt1.97KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OLKR vs SKYC: Fundamental Ratings
OLKR
SKYC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SKYC's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as OLKR (53). This means that SKYC’s stock grew similarly to OLKR’s over the last 12 months.

OLKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as SKYC (100). This means that OLKR’s stock grew similarly to SKYC’s over the last 12 months.

OLKR's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SKYC (100). This means that OLKR’s stock grew similarly to SKYC’s over the last 12 months.

SKYC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OLKR (94). This means that SKYC’s stock grew somewhat faster than OLKR’s over the last 12 months.

SKYC's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as OLKR (100). This means that SKYC’s stock grew similarly to OLKR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OLKRSKYC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
75%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OLKR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKYC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FVIFX36.000.19
+0.53%
Fidelity Advisor Value I
RIRCX69.980.35
+0.50%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R3
MMNVX12.080.06
+0.50%
MassMutual Balanced Y
HMVFX16.340.08
+0.49%
Hartford MidCap Value F
TSCHX18.930.08
+0.42%
Nuveen Quant Small Cap Equity I

OLKR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OLKR and SPXCF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OLKR and SPXCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLKR
1D Price
Change %
OLKR100%
-0.09%
SPXCF - OLKR
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.25%
SKYC - OLKR
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTM - OLKR
4%
Poorly correlated
+9.15%
IHLDF - OLKR
2%
Poorly correlated
+22.64%
GRYP - OLKR
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More

SKYC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SKYC and OZFRY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKYC and OZFRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKYC
1D Price
Change %
SKYC100%
N/A
OZFRY - SKYC
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLKR - SKYC
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
WAI - SKYC
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
LNTO - SKYC
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MATEF - SKYC
0%
Poorly correlated
+8.52%
More