OMC vs PGPEF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMC is a Hold and PGPEF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OMC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePGPEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- OMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PGPEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OMC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- OMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
OMC (@Advertising/Marketing Services) experienced а +0.16% price change this week, while PGPEF (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was +2.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.79%.
Reported Earning Dates
OMC is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Advertising/Marketing Services (+2.91% weekly)Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.
| OMC | PGPEF | OMC / PGPEF | |
| Capitalization | 19.2B | 20.3B | 95% |
| EBITDA | 2.42B | 2.77B | 88% |
| Gain YTD | -4.347 | 3.250 | -134% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.98 | 14.03 | 100% |
| Revenue | 14.7B | 14.8B | 99% |
| Total Cash | 4.43B | 3.68B | 120% |
| Total Debt | 6.5B | 6.19B | 105% |
OMC | PGPEF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OMC's Valuation (15) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is in the same range as PGPEF (19) in the null industry. This means that OMC’s stock grew similarly to PGPEF’s over the last 12 months.
PGPEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMC (46) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that PGPEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMC’s over the last 12 months.
OMC's SMR Rating (26) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGPEF (69) in the null industry. This means that OMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGPEF’s over the last 12 months.
PGPEF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as OMC (62) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that PGPEF’s stock grew similarly to OMC’s over the last 12 months.
OMC's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is in the same range as PGPEF (72) in the null industry. This means that OMC’s stock grew similarly to PGPEF’s over the last 12 months.
| OMC | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% |
OMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMC has been closely correlated with IPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMC jumps, then IPG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMC | 100% | -1.56% | ||
| IPG - OMC | 66% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| DLX - OMC | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| PUBGY - OMC | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| STGW - OMC | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| BOC - OMC | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.55% | ||
More | ||||
PGPEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PGPEF and BAOS have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGPEF and BAOS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGPEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGPEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BAOS - PGPEF | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.56% | ||
| FLNT - PGPEF | 14% Poorly correlated | -4.76% | ||
| EEX - PGPEF | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.08% | ||
| OMC - PGPEF | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.56% | ||
| PUBGY - PGPEF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
More | ||||