OMHLF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
137.9M
SRHYY
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.04 (-15.38%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
236.03M
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMHLF vs SRHYY

Header iconOMHLF vs SRHYY Comparison
Open Charts OMHLF vs SRHYYBanner chart's image
OM Holdings
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization137.9M
Syrah Resources
Price$0.22
Change-$0.04 (-15.38%)
Volume$12.25K
Capitalization236.03M
OMHLF vs SRHYY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRHYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMHLF vs. SRHYY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMHLF is a Hold and SRHYY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (OMHLF: $0.17 vs. SRHYY: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: OMHLF and SRHYY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMHLF: 198% vs. SRHYY: 162%
Market capitalization -- OMHLF: $137.9M vs. SRHYY: $236.03M
OMHLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $137.9M. SRHYY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $236.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMHLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSRHYY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OMHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SRHYY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRHYY is a better buy in the long-term than OMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMHLF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRHYY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMHLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SRHYY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRHYY is a better buy in the short-term than OMHLF.

Price Growth

OMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SRHYY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -12.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRHYY($236M) has a higher market cap than OMHLF($138M). SRHYY YTD gains are higher at: 119.014 vs. OMHLF (-28.082).
OMHLFSRHYYOMHLF / SRHYY
Capitalization138M236M58%
EBITDA49.3MN/A-
Gain YTD-28.082119.014-24%
P/E Ratio13.58N/A-
Revenue578MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRHYY: Fundamental Ratings
SRHYY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMHLFSRHYY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRHYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RALYX10.70N/A
N/A
Lazard Real Assets R6
SXPAX53.05N/A
N/A
DWS S&P 500 Index A
VVOCX20.47N/A
N/A
Invesco Value Opportunities C
MNBIX20.48N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term I
LFGSX41.58N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R4

OMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMHLF and CASXF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMHLF and CASXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMHLF
1D Price
Change %
OMHLF100%
N/A
CASXF - OMHLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRHYY - OMHLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-14.46%
FNCJF - OMHLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
NBMFF - OMHLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.34%
SGML - OMHLF
3%
Poorly correlated
+6.46%
More

SRHYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRHYY and OMHLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRHYY and OMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRHYY
1D Price
Change %
SRHYY100%
-14.46%
OMHLF - SRHYY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SYAAF - SRHYY
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
YORKF - SRHYY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STRPF - SRHYY
13%
Poorly correlated
+8.82%
SMREF - SRHYY
8%
Poorly correlated
+12.78%
More