OMHLF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
137.9M
SRKZF
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMHLF vs SRKZF

Header iconOMHLF vs SRKZF Comparison
Open Charts OMHLF vs SRKZFBanner chart's image
OM Holdings
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization137.9M
Sky Gold
Price$0.03
Change+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Volume$20.27K
Capitalization1.79M
OMHLF vs SRKZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRKZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMHLF vs. SRKZF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMHLF is a Hold and SRKZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (OMHLF: $0.17 vs. SRKZF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: OMHLF and SRKZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMHLF: 198% vs. SRKZF: 482%
Market capitalization -- OMHLF: $137.9M vs. SRKZF: $1.79M
OMHLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $137.9M. SRKZF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMHLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSRKZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OMHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SRKZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRKZF is a better buy in the long-term than OMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMHLF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRKZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMHLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SRKZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRKZF is a better buy in the short-term than OMHLF.

Price Growth

OMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SRKZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +83.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMHLF($138M) has a higher market cap than SRKZF($1.79M). SRKZF YTD gains are higher at: 75.882 vs. OMHLF (-28.082). OMHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.3M vs. SRKZF (-596.13K). OMHLF has higher revenues than SRKZF: OMHLF (578M) vs SRKZF (0).
OMHLFSRKZFOMHLF / SRKZF
Capitalization138M1.79M7,692%
EBITDA49.3M-596.13K-8,270%
Gain YTD-28.08275.882-37%
P/E Ratio13.58N/A-
Revenue578M0-
Total CashN/A199K-
Total DebtN/A12.5K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRKZF: Fundamental Ratings
SRKZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMHLFSRKZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
10%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRKZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DOC18.390.39
+2.17%
Healthpeak Properties
JZ1.54N/A
N/A
Jianzhi Education Technology Group Company Limited
CNTY2.77-0.01
-0.36%
Century Casinos
NAK0.85-0.01
-1.10%
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd
PTEN5.67-0.16
-2.74%
Patterson-UTI Energy

OMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMHLF and CASXF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMHLF and CASXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMHLF
1D Price
Change %
OMHLF100%
N/A
CASXF - OMHLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRHYY - OMHLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-14.46%
FNCJF - OMHLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
NBMFF - OMHLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.34%
SGML - OMHLF
3%
Poorly correlated
+6.46%
More