OMMSF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
OPWEF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

OMMSF vs OPWEF

Header iconOMMSF vs OPWEF Comparison
Open Charts OMMSF vs OPWEFBanner chart's image
Omineca Mining & Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$4K
CapitalizationN/A
Opawica Explorations
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$47.06K
CapitalizationN/A
OMMSF vs OPWEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
OMMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OPWEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMMSF vs. OPWEF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMMSF is a StrongBuy and OPWEF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (OMMSF: $0.03 vs. OPWEF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: OMMSF and OPWEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMMSF: 5% vs. OPWEF: 34%
Market capitalization -- OMMSF: $8.52M vs. OPWEF: $571.27K
OMMSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.52M. OPWEF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $571.27K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMMSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOPWEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OMMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OPWEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OPWEF is a better buy in the long-term than OMMSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMMSF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPWEF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMMSF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OPWEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMMSF is a better buy in the short-term than OPWEF.

Price Growth

OMMSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.04% price change this week, while OPWEF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMMSF($8.52M) has a higher market cap than OPWEF($571K). OPWEF YTD gains are higher at: 141.935 vs. OMMSF (-22.940). OMMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -983.34K vs. OPWEF (-2.31M). OMMSF (0) and OPWEF (0) have equivalent revenues.
OMMSFOPWEFOMMSF / OPWEF
Capitalization8.52M571K1,493%
EBITDA-983.34K-2.31M43%
Gain YTD-22.940141.935-16%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total CashN/A294K-
Total DebtN/A40K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMMSF vs OPWEF: Fundamental Ratings
OMMSF
OPWEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1354
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9696
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9035
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMMSF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as OPWEF (46). This means that OMMSF’s stock grew similarly to OPWEF’s over the last 12 months.

OMMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as OPWEF (100). This means that OMMSF’s stock grew similarly to OPWEF’s over the last 12 months.

OMMSF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as OPWEF (96). This means that OMMSF’s stock grew similarly to OPWEF’s over the last 12 months.

OPWEF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMMSF (90). This means that OPWEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMMSF’s over the last 12 months.

OPWEF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as OMMSF (100). This means that OPWEF’s stock grew similarly to OMMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMMSFOPWEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OMMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OPWEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTCKX54.60N/A
N/A
MFS Technology R1
POGAX72.16-0.25
-0.35%
Putnam Large Cap Growth A
WEEIX11.14-0.09
-0.80%
TETON Westwood Equity I
RSCRX30.02-0.33
-1.09%
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity R6
TRMNX20.92-0.98
-4.47%
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index

OMMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMMSF and MCDMF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMMSF and MCDMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMMSF
1D Price
Change %
OMMSF100%
N/A
MCDMF - OMMSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBBXF - OMMSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.73%
RVLGF - OMMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
CRCUF - OMMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
FFOXF - OMMSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
More

OPWEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OPWEF and HMRFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OPWEF and HMRFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPWEF
1D Price
Change %
OPWEF100%
-2.31%
HMRFF - OPWEF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.12%
TROYF - OPWEF
20%
Poorly correlated
-17.75%
OMMSF - OPWEF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORFDF - OPWEF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.50%
ORZCF - OPWEF
1%
Poorly correlated
-4.47%
More