OMMSF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
8.52M
RGCCF
Price
$0.24
Change
+$0.01 (+4.35%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
7.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMMSF vs RGCCF

Header iconOMMSF vs RGCCF Comparison
Open Charts OMMSF vs RGCCFBanner chart's image
Omineca Mining & Metals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.5K
Capitalization8.52M
RELEVANT GOLD
Price$0.24
Change+$0.01 (+4.35%)
Volume$39.89K
Capitalization7.55M
OMMSF vs RGCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMMSF vs. RGCCF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMMSF is a Hold and RGCCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (OMMSF: $0.04 vs. RGCCF: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: OMMSF and RGCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMMSF: 24% vs. RGCCF: 121%
Market capitalization -- OMMSF: $8.52M vs. RGCCF: $7.55M
OMMSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.52M. RGCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMMSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OMMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMMSF is a better buy in the long-term than RGCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMMSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGCCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMMSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RGCCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGCCF is a better buy in the short-term than OMMSF.

Price Growth

OMMSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -11.87% price change this week, while RGCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.42% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMMSF($8.52M) has a higher market cap than RGCCF($7.55M). RGCCF YTD gains are higher at: 27.660 vs. OMMSF (-31.071). OMMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -983.34K vs. RGCCF (-5.98M). OMMSF (0) and RGCCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
OMMSFRGCCFOMMSF / RGCCF
Capitalization8.52M7.55M113%
EBITDA-983.34K-5.98M16%
Gain YTD-31.07127.660-112%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total CashN/A766K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMMSF: Fundamental Ratings
OMMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMMSFRGCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAN8.870.17
+1.95%
Banco Santander SA
JHG43.130.14
+0.33%
Janus Henderson Group plc
SAFT70.420.19
+0.27%
Safety Insurance Group
AMTX2.57-0.11
-4.10%
Aemetis
CCTG1.03-0.07
-6.36%
CCSC Technology International Holdings Limited

OMMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMMSF and BBBXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMMSF and BBBXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMMSF
1D Price
Change %
OMMSF100%
-5.16%
BBBXF - OMMSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
RVLGF - OMMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
CRCUF - OMMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.28%
FFOXF - OMMSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.50%
PGLDF - OMMSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
More

RGCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGCCF and GMINF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGCCF and GMINF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGCCF
1D Price
Change %
RGCCF100%
+2.87%
GMINF - RGCCF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
ASM - RGCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
DCHRF - RGCCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DDEJF - RGCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
OMMSF - RGCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.16%
More