OMVJF
Price
$54.84
Change
+$0.50 (+0.92%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
17.58B
PCCYF
Price
$0.97
Change
+$0.02 (+2.08%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
222.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMVJF vs PCCYF

Header iconOMVJF vs PCCYF Comparison
Open Charts OMVJF vs PCCYFBanner chart's image
OMV AG
Price$54.84
Change+$0.50 (+0.92%)
Volume$200
Capitalization17.58B
PetroChina
Price$0.97
Change+$0.02 (+2.08%)
Volume$14.05K
Capitalization222.55B
OMVJF vs PCCYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMVJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PCCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMVJF vs. PCCYF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMVJF is a Buy and PCCYF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (OMVJF: $54.84 vs. PCCYF: $0.98)
Brand notoriety: OMVJF and PCCYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMVJF: 71% vs. PCCYF: 41%
Market capitalization -- OMVJF: $17.58B vs. PCCYF: $222.55B
OMVJF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $17.58B. PCCYF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $222.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $465.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $56.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMVJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePCCYF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • OMVJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PCCYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PCCYF is a better buy in the long-term than OMVJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMVJF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCCYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMVJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PCCYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCCYF is a better buy in the short-term than OMVJF.

Price Growth

OMVJF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PCCYF (@Integrated Oil) price change was +1.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-2.54% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCCYF($223B) has a higher market cap than OMVJF($17.6B). OMVJF has higher P/E ratio than PCCYF: OMVJF (18.44) vs PCCYF (7.88). OMVJF YTD gains are higher at: 48.056 vs. PCCYF (26.623). PCCYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 262B vs. OMVJF (6.75B). PCCYF has more cash in the bank: 300B vs. OMVJF (6.39B). OMVJF has less debt than PCCYF: OMVJF (7.54B) vs PCCYF (365B). PCCYF has higher revenues than OMVJF: PCCYF (2.88T) vs OMVJF (33.1B).
OMVJFPCCYFOMVJF / PCCYF
Capitalization17.6B223B8%
EBITDA6.75B262B3%
Gain YTD48.05626.623181%
P/E Ratio18.447.88234%
Revenue33.1B2.88T1%
Total Cash6.39B300B2%
Total Debt7.54B365B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMVJF vs PCCYF: Fundamental Ratings
OMVJF
PCCYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4984
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5633
SMR RATING
1..100
8468
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
833
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCCYF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as OMVJF (22). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to OMVJF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as OMVJF (56). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to OMVJF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as OMVJF (84). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to OMVJF’s over the last 12 months.

OMVJF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as PCCYF (48). This means that OMVJF’s stock grew similarly to PCCYF’s over the last 12 months.

OMVJF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as PCCYF (33). This means that OMVJF’s stock grew similarly to PCCYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMVJFPCCYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMVJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PCCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHM29.850.18
+0.61%
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
PIM3.380.02
+0.60%
Picard Medical Inc
TBLD20.000.08
+0.40%
Thornburg Income Builder Opportunities Trust
CIF1.75-0.01
-0.57%
MFS Intermediate High Income Fund
LLYX12.82-0.56
-4.19%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF

OMVJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMVJF and PCCYF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMVJF and PCCYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMVJF
1D Price
Change %
OMVJF100%
N/A
PCCYF - OMVJF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
OMVKY - OMVJF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
REPYY - OMVJF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
OAOFY - OMVJF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
REPYF - OMVJF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PCCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCCYF and SHEL have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCCYF and SHEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCCYF
1D Price
Change %
PCCYF100%
+1.56%
SHEL - PCCYF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
EQNR - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
SNPMF - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
EC - PCCYF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
BP - PCCYF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
More