OMZNF
Price
$0.32
Change
-$0.01 (-3.03%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
196.1M
WLBMF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
95.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMZNF vs WLBMF

Header iconOMZNF vs WLBMF Comparison
Open Charts OMZNF vs WLBMFBanner chart's image
Osisko Metals
Price$0.32
Change-$0.01 (-3.03%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization196.1M
Wallbridge Mining
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$469.74K
Capitalization95.35M
OMZNF vs WLBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMZNF vs. WLBMF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMZNF is a Hold and WLBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (OMZNF: $0.32 vs. WLBMF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: OMZNF and WLBMF are both not notable
OMZNF represents the Other Metals/Minerals, while WLBMF is part of the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMZNF: 12% vs. WLBMF: 142%
Market capitalization -- OMZNF: $196.1M vs. WLBMF: $95.35M
OMZNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $196.1M. WLBMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $95.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMZNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OMZNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMZNF is a better buy in the long-term than WLBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMZNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLBMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMZNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WLBMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both OMZNF and WLBMF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

OMZNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.99% price change this week, while WLBMF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6082.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

@Precious Metals (+5.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMZNF($196M) has a higher market cap than WLBMF($95.4M). WLBMF YTD gains are higher at: 109.443 vs. OMZNF (30.250). WLBMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.13M vs. OMZNF (-15.9M). OMZNF has more cash in the bank: 86.1M vs. WLBMF (10.7M). WLBMF has less debt than OMZNF: WLBMF (5.04K) vs OMZNF (57.6M). OMZNF (0) and WLBMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
OMZNFWLBMFOMZNF / WLBMF
Capitalization196M95.4M205%
EBITDA-15.9M-7.13M223%
Gain YTD30.250109.44328%
P/E Ratio5.02N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash86.1M10.7M805%
Total Debt57.6M5.04K1,142,857%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMZNF vs WLBMF: Fundamental Ratings
OMZNF
WLBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2128
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
99100
SMR RATING
1..100
9693
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
29100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMZNF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as WLBMF (76). This means that OMZNF’s stock grew similarly to WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMZNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as WLBMF (100). This means that OMZNF’s stock grew similarly to WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

WLBMF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as OMZNF (96). This means that WLBMF’s stock grew similarly to OMZNF’s over the last 12 months.

WLBMF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as OMZNF (43). This means that WLBMF’s stock grew similarly to OMZNF’s over the last 12 months.

OMZNF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WLBMF (100). This means that OMZNF’s stock grew significantly faster than WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMZNFWLBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GENMF0.370.02
+5.57%
Generation Mining Limited
KIERF2.75N/A
N/A
Kier Group Plc
CCUR2500.00N/A
N/A
CCUR Holdings, Inc.
NRGIY19.68N/A
N/A
Neoenergia SA
DHLGY44.05-0.27
-0.61%
Deutsche Post AG

OMZNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMZNF and PGEZF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMZNF and PGEZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMZNF
1D Price
Change %
OMZNF100%
-3.11%
PGEZF - OMZNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+6.86%
SMDZF - OMZNF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
CXOXF - OMZNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+10.55%
WLBMF - OMZNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.98%
SLVDF - OMZNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
More

WLBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLBMF and FGOVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLBMF and FGOVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLBMF
1D Price
Change %
WLBMF100%
-7.98%
FGOVF - WLBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
USAS - WLBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.81%
IVPAF - WLBMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.17%
RIO - WLBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
AZMCF - WLBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+9.18%
More