OMZNF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
188.36M
WLBMF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
51.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMZNF vs WLBMF

Header iconOMZNF vs WLBMF Comparison
Open Charts OMZNF vs WLBMFBanner chart's image
Osisko Metals
Price$0.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$102.01K
Capitalization188.36M
Wallbridge Mining
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$29.47K
Capitalization51.98M
OMZNF vs WLBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OMZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMZNF vs. WLBMF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMZNF is a Hold and WLBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (OMZNF: $0.31 vs. WLBMF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: OMZNF and WLBMF are both not notable
OMZNF represents the Other Metals/Minerals, while WLBMF is part of the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMZNF: 458% vs. WLBMF: 15%
Market capitalization -- OMZNF: $188.36M vs. WLBMF: $51.98M
OMZNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $188.36M. WLBMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $51.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $79.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMZNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OMZNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMZNF is a better buy in the long-term than WLBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMZNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLBMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMZNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WLBMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WLBMF is a better buy in the short-term than OMZNF.

Price Growth

OMZNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.91% price change this week, while WLBMF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +107.24%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5323.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

@Precious Metals (+0.84% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMZNF($188M) has a higher market cap than WLBMF($52M). OMZNF YTD gains are higher at: 25.460 vs. WLBMF (21.065). OMZNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.12M vs. WLBMF (-7.78M). OMZNF has more cash in the bank: 98.8M vs. WLBMF (16.9M). WLBMF has less debt than OMZNF: WLBMF (8.77K) vs OMZNF (60.7M). OMZNF (0) and WLBMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
OMZNFWLBMFOMZNF / WLBMF
Capitalization188M52M362%
EBITDA-1.12M-7.78M14%
Gain YTD25.46021.065121%
P/E Ratio5.02N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash98.8M16.9M585%
Total Debt60.7M8.77K692,527%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMZNF vs WLBMF: Fundamental Ratings
OMZNF
WLBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMZNF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as WLBMF (76). This means that OMZNF’s stock grew similarly to WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMZNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WLBMF (100). This means that OMZNF’s stock grew similarly to WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

WLBMF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as OMZNF (93). This means that WLBMF’s stock grew similarly to OMZNF’s over the last 12 months.

OMZNF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as WLBMF (53). This means that OMZNF’s stock grew similarly to WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMZNF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WLBMF (100). This means that OMZNF’s stock grew significantly faster than WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMZNFWLBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OMZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WNGRF192.53N/A
N/A
Weston George Ltd. (Canada)
ACITF0.20N/A
N/A
Asian Citrus Holdings Ltd.
CVOSF6.47N/A
N/A
COVEO SOLUTIONS INC.
JBFCY15.61-0.14
-0.89%
Jollibee Foods Corp.
AGXPF0.24N/A
-1.01%
SILVER X MNG CORP.

OMZNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMZNF and PGEZF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMZNF and PGEZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMZNF
1D Price
Change %
OMZNF100%
-0.49%
PGEZF - OMZNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
SMDZF - OMZNF
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.42%
CXOXF - OMZNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLBMF - OMZNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
SLVDF - OMZNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.63%
More

WLBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLBMF and FGOVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLBMF and FGOVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLBMF
1D Price
Change %
WLBMF100%
+3.09%
FGOVF - WLBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
USAS - WLBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
IVPAF - WLBMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
RIO - WLBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
AZMCF - WLBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
More