Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ONECX vs RLBFX
ONECX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ONECX vs RLBFX
JPMorgan Investor Growth & Income C
Price$20.51
Change+$0.21 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.15B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.98
Change+$0.57 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.29B
ONECX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ONECX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONECX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. ONECX (5.15B). ONECX (2.07) and RLBFX (2.00) have matching dividends . ONECX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ONECX (28 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ONECX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. ONECX (8.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ONECX: RLBFX (250) vs ONECX (500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.89 vs. ONECX (7.00). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.33 vs. ONECX (25.10).
| ONECX | RLBFX | ONECX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.29 | 510% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.29 | 514% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.193 | 14.596 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.15B | 261B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 2.00 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 8.89 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.50 | 54.62 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.10 | 43.33 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.11 | 78.27 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement