Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ONECX vs RLBFX
ONECX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ONECX vs RLBFX
JPMorgan Investor Growth & Income C
Price$20.48
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.17B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.68
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.26B
ONECX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ONECX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONECX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. ONECX (5.17B). ONECX (2.12) and RLBFX (2.05) have matching dividends . ONECX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ONECX (28 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ONECX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. ONECX (8.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ONECX: RLBFX (250) vs ONECX (500). RLBFX (10.64) and ONECX (10.39) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.98 vs. ONECX (30.42).
| ONECX | RLBFX | ONECX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.29 | 510% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.29 | 514% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.184 | 13.320 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.17B | 262B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 2.05 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.39 | 10.64 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.18 | 43.44 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.42 | 44.98 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.21 | 80.99 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement