Ad is loading...
ONEQ vs SCHG
ONEQ vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts ONEQ vs SCHG
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite ETF
Price$76.85
Change-$1.85 (-2.35%)
Volume$305.52K
Net Assets7.71B
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$28.01
Change-$0.72 (-2.51%)
Volume$11.07M
Net Assets38.71B
ONEQ vs SCHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ONEQ vs. SCHG commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONEQ is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 38.7B vs. ONEQ (7.71B). ONEQ has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: ONEQ (1.039) vs SCHG (0.502). ONEQ was incepted earlier than SCHG: ONEQ (21 years) vs SCHG (15 years). SCHG has a higher turnover ONEQ (4.00) vs ONEQ (4.00).
| ONEQ | SCHG | ONEQ / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 1.039 | 0.502 | 207% |
| Net Assets | 7.71B | 38.7B | 20% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 9.00 | 44% |
| Yield | 0.67 | 0.43 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ONEQ | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 9 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ONEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEQ has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ONEQ jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEQ | 100% | -2.35% | ||
| MSFT - ONEQ | 70% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| AMZN - ONEQ | 69% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| AVGO - ONEQ | 68% Closely correlated | -3.56% | ||
| AAPL - ONEQ | 67% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| NVDA - ONEQ | 67% Closely correlated | -4.05% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -2.51% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| SNPS - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| KLAC - SCHG | 73% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
More | ||||