Ad is loading...
ONEQ vs SCHG
ONEQ vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts ONEQ vs SCHG
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite ETF
Price$67.52
Change+$1.90 (+2.90%)
Volume$500
Net Assets6.44B
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$24.90
Change+$0.68 (+2.81%)
Volume$54.36K
Net Assets33.59B
ONEQ vs SCHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ONEQ vs. SCHG commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONEQ is a Buy and SCHG is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 33.6B vs. ONEQ (6.44B). SCHG (-13.007) and ONEQ (-13.613) have matching annual dividend yield . ONEQ was incepted earlier than SCHG: ONEQ (22 years) vs SCHG (15 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than ONEQ (0.21). ONEQ has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| ONEQ | SCHG | ONEQ / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | -13.613 | -13.007 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 6.44B | 33.6B | 19% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.21 | 0.04 | 525% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 3.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 0.70 | 0.45 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ONEQ | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ONEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEQ has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ONEQ jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEQ | 100% | +2.32% | ||
| MSFT - ONEQ | 70% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| AMZN - ONEQ | 69% Closely correlated | +4.28% | ||
| AVGO - ONEQ | 68% Closely correlated | +4.32% | ||
| AAPL - ONEQ | 67% Closely correlated | +2.43% | ||
| NVDA - ONEQ | 67% Closely correlated | +3.86% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +2.37% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| SNPS - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | +5.12% | ||
| META - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | +4.00% | ||
More | ||||