It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ONEW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ONEW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVV’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
ONEW (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -14.24% price change this week, while SVV (@Specialty Stores) price change was +7.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.52%.
ONEW is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
SVV is expected to report earnings on Mar 07, 2025.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
ONEW | SVV | ONEW / SVV | |
Capitalization | 410M | 3.12B | 13% |
EBITDA | 22.2M | 202M | 11% |
Gain YTD | -46.345 | -40.564 | 114% |
P/E Ratio | 4.78 | 56.82 | 8% |
Revenue | 1.93B | 1.5B | 129% |
Total Cash | 44.6M | 180M | 25% |
Total Debt | 1.14B | 1.29B | 88% |
ONEW | SVV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago81% | 14 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 12 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago81% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PRJDX | 46.08 | 0.34 | +0.74% |
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities R4 | |||
JSIVX | 23.44 | 0.11 | +0.47% |
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value L | |||
NSFLX | 13.27 | 0.06 | +0.45% |
Natixis Target Retirement 2055 N | |||
ARIFX | 11.24 | 0.04 | +0.36% |
Aristotle International Eq I | |||
PJIZX | 7.47 | 0.01 | +0.10% |
PGIM Quant Solutions International Eq Z |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEW has been closely correlated with HZO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ONEW jumps, then HZO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONEW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ONEW | 100% | -1.63% | ||
HZO - ONEW | 73% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
MBUU - ONEW | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
CWH - ONEW | 54% Loosely correlated | +5.03% | ||
MCFT - ONEW | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
ABG - ONEW | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVV has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVV jumps, then RH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SVV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SVV | 100% | +2.79% | ||
RH - SVV | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.64% | ||
ONEW - SVV | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
EYE - SVV | 35% Loosely correlated | +4.52% | ||
CWH - SVV | 33% Loosely correlated | +5.03% | ||
CARS - SVV | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
More |