ONVC
Price
$2.02
Change
+$0.07 (+3.59%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
15.34M
WW
Price
$31.44
Change
+$0.43 (+1.39%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
313.99M
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ONVC vs WW

Header iconONVC vs WW Comparison
Open Charts ONVC vs WWBanner chart's image
Online Vacation Center Holdings
Price$2.02
Change+$0.07 (+3.59%)
Volume$500
Capitalization15.34M
WW International
Price$31.44
Change+$0.43 (+1.39%)
Volume$310.25K
Capitalization313.99M
ONVC vs WW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ONVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ONVC vs. WW commentary
Aug 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONVC is a Buy and WW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2025
Stock price -- (ONVC: $2.02 vs. WW: $31.44)
Brand notoriety: ONVC: Not notable vs. WW: Notable
ONVC represents the Consumer Sundries, while WW is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ONVC: 51% vs. WW: 87%
Market capitalization -- ONVC: $15.34M vs. WW: $313.99M
ONVC [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $15.34M. WW’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $313.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $185.41B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $28.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.06B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ONVC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ONVC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ONVC is a better buy in the long-term than WW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ONVC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ONVC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ONVC (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WW (@Personnel Services) price change was -0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +173.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

WW is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+2.77% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (+0.94% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WW($314M) has a higher market cap than ONVC($15.3M). ONVC has higher P/E ratio than WW: ONVC (16.69) vs WW (2.32). WW YTD gains are higher at: 2375.591 vs. ONVC (24.308).
ONVCWWONVC / WW
Capitalization15.3M314M5%
EBITDAN/A1.15B-
Gain YTD24.3082375.5911%
P/E Ratio16.692.32719%
RevenueN/A741M-
Total CashN/A152M-
Total DebtN/A477M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ONVC vs WW: Fundamental Ratings
ONVC
WW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3272
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9884
SMR RATING
1..100
2411
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4334
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2058
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ONVC's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as WW (83) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that ONVC’s stock grew similarly to WW’s over the last 12 months.

WW's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as ONVC (98) in the null industry. This means that WW’s stock grew similarly to ONVC’s over the last 12 months.

WW's SMR Rating (11) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as ONVC (24) in the null industry. This means that WW’s stock grew similarly to ONVC’s over the last 12 months.

WW's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as ONVC (43) in the null industry. This means that WW’s stock grew similarly to ONVC’s over the last 12 months.

ONVC's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WW (58) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that ONVC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ONVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ONVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LST37.980.63
+1.68%
Leuthold Select Industries ETF
EWA27.260.40
+1.49%
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
VICE36.070.36
+1.00%
AdvisorShares Vice ETF
DBEZ53.060.33
+0.63%
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Eq ETF
PFFV23.230.06
+0.26%
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF

ONVC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ONVC and MNLXF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ONVC and MNLXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONVC
1D Price
Change %
ONVC100%
N/A
MNLXF - ONVC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNLIY - ONVC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTRP - ONVC
6%
Poorly correlated
-6.97%
TCOM - ONVC
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
EM - ONVC
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.73%
More