OOBHF
Price
$2.80
Change
-$1.30 (-31.71%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
433.29M
WOSSF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.04 (+36.36%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
82.27M
Interact to see
Advertisement

OOBHF vs WOSSF

Header iconOOBHF vs WOSSF Comparison
Open Charts OOBHF vs WOSSFBanner chart's image
On the Beach Group
Price$2.80
Change-$1.30 (-31.71%)
Volume$42.23K
Capitalization433.29M
Water Oasis Group
Price$0.15
Change+$0.04 (+36.36%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization82.27M
OOBHF vs WOSSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WOSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OOBHF vs. WOSSF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OOBHF is a Hold and WOSSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (OOBHF: $2.80 vs. WOSSF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: OOBHF and WOSSF are both not notable
OOBHF represents the Consumer Sundries, while WOSSF is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OOBHF: 261% vs. WOSSF: 35%
Market capitalization -- OOBHF: $433.29M vs. WOSSF: $82.27M
OOBHF [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $433.29M. WOSSF’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $82.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $180.71B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.07B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OOBHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWOSSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OOBHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WOSSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WOSSF is a better buy in the long-term than OOBHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WOSSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WOSSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

OOBHF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -31.70% price change this week, while WOSSF (@Personnel Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +37.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.31%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +2.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +252.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (-0.38% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (+2.65% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OOBHF($433M) has a higher market cap than WOSSF($82.3M). OOBHF has higher P/E ratio than WOSSF: OOBHF (17.40) vs WOSSF (9.32). WOSSF YTD gains are higher at: 41.827 vs. OOBHF (16.667). WOSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 272M vs. OOBHF (45.7M). WOSSF has more cash in the bank: 633M vs. OOBHF (10.5M). OOBHF has less debt than WOSSF: OOBHF (42M) vs WOSSF (165M). WOSSF has higher revenues than OOBHF: WOSSF (972M) vs OOBHF (132M).
OOBHFWOSSFOOBHF / WOSSF
Capitalization433M82.3M526%
EBITDA45.7M272M17%
Gain YTD16.66741.82740%
P/E Ratio17.409.32187%
Revenue132M972M14%
Total Cash10.5M633M2%
Total Debt42M165M25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OOBHF vs WOSSF: Fundamental Ratings
OOBHF
WOSSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9830
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10095
SMR RATING
1..100
7343
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2415
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WOSSF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OOBHF (50). This means that WOSSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OOBHF’s over the last 12 months.

WOSSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as OOBHF (100). This means that WOSSF’s stock grew similarly to OOBHF’s over the last 12 months.

WOSSF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as OOBHF (73). This means that WOSSF’s stock grew similarly to OOBHF’s over the last 12 months.

WOSSF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as OOBHF (63). This means that WOSSF’s stock grew similarly to OOBHF’s over the last 12 months.

WOSSF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as OOBHF (24). This means that WOSSF’s stock grew similarly to OOBHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WOSSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WOSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVCAF12.981.96
+17.79%
Investcorp AI Acquisition Corp.
RSMDF26.501.64
+6.60%
Resmed Inc.
CRWRF34.00N/A
N/A
Craneware PLC
GLNS1.05N/A
N/A
Golden Star Resource Corp
SSAAY2.90-0.07
-2.52%
SSab Swedish Steel AB

OOBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OOBHF and TUIFF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OOBHF and TUIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OOBHF
1D Price
Change %
OOBHF100%
N/A
TUIFF - OOBHF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEBJF - OOBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WOSSF - OOBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSMNF - OOBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRZBF - OOBHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WOSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WOSSF and TRZBF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WOSSF and TRZBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WOSSF
1D Price
Change %
WOSSF100%
N/A
TRZBF - WOSSF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TUIFF - WOSSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNLIY - WOSSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGDDF - WOSSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OOBHF - WOSSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More