OPHC
Price
$4.73
Change
+$0.05 (+1.07%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
33.75M
2 days until earnings call
THVB
Price
$72.00
Change
+$0.60 (+0.84%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
387.6M
Ad is loading...

OPHC vs THVB

Header iconOPHC vs THVB Comparison
Open Charts OPHC vs THVBBanner chart's image
OptimumBank Holdings
Price$4.73
Change+$0.05 (+1.07%)
Volume$14.58K
Capitalization33.75M
Thomasville Bancshares
Price$72.00
Change+$0.60 (+0.84%)
Volume$110
Capitalization387.6M
OPHC vs THVB Comparison Chart
Loading...
OPHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THVB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OPHC vs. THVB commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OPHC is a Hold and THVB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (OPHC: $4.73 vs. THVB: $72.00)
Brand notoriety: OPHC and THVB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OPHC: 25% vs. THVB: 18%
Market capitalization -- OPHC: $33.75M vs. THVB: $387.6M
OPHC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $33.75M. THVB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $387.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OPHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTHVB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OPHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • THVB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, THVB is a better buy in the long-term than OPHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OPHC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THVB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OPHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • THVB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, THVB is a better buy in the short-term than OPHC.

Price Growth

OPHC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.65% price change this week, while THVB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

OPHC is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
THVB($388M) has a higher market cap than OPHC($33.8M). THVB has higher P/E ratio than OPHC: THVB (16.03) vs OPHC (4.74). THVB YTD gains are higher at: 1.408 vs. OPHC (-0.630). THVB has less debt than OPHC: THVB (24.3M) vs OPHC (64.2M). THVB has higher revenues than OPHC: THVB (47.2M) vs OPHC (27.2M).
OPHCTHVBOPHC / THVB
Capitalization33.8M388M9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.6301.408-45%
P/E Ratio4.7416.0330%
Revenue27.2M47.2M58%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt64.2M24.3M264%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OPHC vs THVB: Fundamental Ratings
OPHC
THVB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5815
SMR RATING
1..100
4427
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9175
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OPHC's Valuation (6) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for THVB (97) in the null industry. This means that OPHC’s stock grew significantly faster than THVB’s over the last 12 months.

THVB's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OPHC (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that THVB’s stock grew somewhat faster than OPHC’s over the last 12 months.

THVB's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as OPHC (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that THVB’s stock grew similarly to OPHC’s over the last 12 months.

THVB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as OPHC (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that THVB’s stock grew similarly to OPHC’s over the last 12 months.

THVB's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as OPHC (91) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that THVB’s stock grew similarly to OPHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OPHCTHVB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
19%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
29%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
12%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OPHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THVB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZVNIX40.030.38
+0.96%
Zevenbergen Growth Institutional
ODICX45.690.32
+0.71%
Invesco Discovery C
SLPIX116.420.45
+0.39%
ProFunds Small Cap Inv
BUIBX20.710.08
+0.39%
Buffalo Flexible Allocation Inst
MCILX17.66N/A
N/A
BlackRock International Inv C

OPHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OPHC and LSBK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OPHC and LSBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPHC
1D Price
Change %
OPHC100%
+0.96%
LSBK - OPHC
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOH - OPHC
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
PLBC - OPHC
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.98%
USCB - OPHC
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
HBAN - OPHC
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
More

THVB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that THVB and MLYNF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that THVB and MLYNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THVB
1D Price
Change %
THVB100%
+0.84%
MLYNF - THVB
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPHC - THVB
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
AFBI - THVB
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
FINW - THVB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
TDCB - THVB
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More