ORKLY
Price
$9.66
Change
+$0.04 (+0.42%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
7.87B
75 days until earnings call
PEFDF
Price
$0.57
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
578.36M
Ad is loading...

ORKLY vs PEFDF

Header iconORKLY vs PEFDF Comparison
Open Charts ORKLY vs PEFDFBanner chart's image
Orkla ASA
Price$9.66
Change+$0.04 (+0.42%)
Volume$15.06K
Capitalization7.87B
DELFI
Price$0.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$215.7K
Capitalization578.36M
ORKLY vs PEFDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ORKLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ORKLY vs. PEFDF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ORKLY is a Hold and PEFDF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (ORKLY: $9.66 vs. PEFDF: $0.57)
Brand notoriety: ORKLY and PEFDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ORKLY: 52% vs. PEFDF: 478%
Market capitalization -- ORKLY: $7.87B vs. PEFDF: $578.36M
ORKLY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $7.87B. PEFDF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $578.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ORKLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePEFDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ORKLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PEFDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ORKLY is a better buy in the long-term than PEFDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ORKLY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ORKLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ORKLY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.92% price change this week, while PEFDF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

ORKLY is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ORKLY($7.87B) has a higher market cap than PEFDF($578M). ORKLY has higher P/E ratio than PEFDF: ORKLY (15.20) vs PEFDF (13.35). ORKLY YTD gains are higher at: 11.547 vs. PEFDF (-1.724). ORKLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.7B vs. PEFDF (67.2M). ORKLY has more cash in the bank: 2.51B vs. PEFDF (94.6M). PEFDF has less debt than ORKLY: PEFDF (13.2M) vs ORKLY (24.3B). ORKLY has higher revenues than PEFDF: ORKLY (64.1B) vs PEFDF (441M).
ORKLYPEFDFORKLY / PEFDF
Capitalization7.87B578M1,361%
EBITDA10.7B67.2M15,923%
Gain YTD11.547-1.724-670%
P/E Ratio15.2013.35114%
Revenue64.1B441M14,535%
Total Cash2.51B94.6M2,656%
Total Debt24.3B13.2M184,091%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ORKLY vs PEFDF: Fundamental Ratings
ORKLY
PEFDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54100
SMR RATING
1..100
9953
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2658
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PEFDF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as ORKLY (10). This means that PEFDF’s stock grew similarly to ORKLY’s over the last 12 months.

ORKLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEFDF (100). This means that ORKLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PEFDF’s over the last 12 months.

PEFDF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ORKLY (99). This means that PEFDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ORKLY’s over the last 12 months.

ORKLY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as PEFDF (62). This means that ORKLY’s stock grew similarly to PEFDF’s over the last 12 months.

ORKLY's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as PEFDF (58). This means that ORKLY’s stock grew similarly to PEFDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ORKLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ORKLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSNGY13.630.18
+1.30%
Hang Seng Bank Ltd.
KNBWY13.520.11
+0.82%
Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd.
DTEGY36.02-0.03
-0.08%
Deutsche Telekom AG
PEGRY11.05-0.08
-0.67%
Pennon Group PLC
KBLB0.09N/A
-1.37%
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

ORKLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ORKLY and DANOY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ORKLY and DANOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORKLY
1D Price
Change %
ORKLY100%
+0.42%
DANOY - ORKLY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
NSRGY - ORKLY
18%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
ORKLF - ORKLY
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSRGF - ORKLY
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.43%
PEFDF - ORKLY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PEFDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PEFDF and ORKLY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PEFDF and ORKLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PEFDF
1D Price
Change %
PEFDF100%
N/A
ORKLY - PEFDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
NSRGY - PEFDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
NSRGF - PEFDF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.43%
PIFMF - PEFDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFFY - PEFDF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More