ORMNF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Jan 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.83M
PBMLF
Price
$0.52
Change
+$0.08 (+18.18%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.74M
Ad is loading...

ORMNF vs PBMLF

Header iconORMNF vs PBMLF Comparison
Open Charts ORMNF vs PBMLFBanner chart's image
Orex Minerals
Price$0.09
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$36.3K
Capitalization2.83M
Pacific Booker Minerals
Price$0.52
Change+$0.08 (+18.18%)
Volume$600
Capitalization7.74M
ORMNF vs PBMLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ORMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ORMNF vs. PBMLF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ORMNF is a Hold and PBMLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ORMNF: $0.09 vs. PBMLF: $0.52)
Brand notoriety: ORMNF and PBMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ORMNF: 273% vs. PBMLF: 18%
Market capitalization -- ORMNF: $2.83M vs. PBMLF: $7.74M
ORMNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.83M. PBMLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $7.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ORMNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePBMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ORMNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PBMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ORMNF and PBMLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ORMNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBMLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ORMNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PBMLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBMLF is a better buy in the short-term than ORMNF.

Price Growth

ORMNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PBMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBMLF($7.74M) has a higher market cap than ORMNF($2.83M). PBMLF YTD gains are higher at: 43.238 vs. ORMNF (-4.993). PBMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -906.77K vs. ORMNF (-1.83M). ORMNF has more cash in the bank: 1.59M vs. PBMLF (404K). ORMNF (0) and PBMLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ORMNFPBMLFORMNF / PBMLF
Capitalization2.83M7.74M37%
EBITDA-1.83M-906.77K202%
Gain YTD-4.99343.238-12%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.59M404K395%
Total Debt722KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ORMNF vs PBMLF: Fundamental Ratings
ORMNF
PBMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9259
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ORMNF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBMLF (97). This means that ORMNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

ORMNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that ORMNF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

ORMNF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that ORMNF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PBMLF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ORMNF (92). This means that PBMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ORMNF’s over the last 12 months.

ORMNF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that ORMNF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ORMNFPBMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ORMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACIHX62.060.69
+1.12%
American Century Growth G
FTXSX50.660.46
+0.92%
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp GrInstl
TOLCX15.170.09
+0.60%
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure C
EDIRX10.580.04
+0.38%
Eaton Vance Global Income Builder R
WSCOX13.530.04
+0.30%
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap Inst

ORMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ORMNF and WCUFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ORMNF and WCUFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORMNF
1D Price
Change %
ORMNF100%
N/A
WCUFF - ORMNF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
TORVF - ORMNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWXPF - ORMNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORRCF - ORMNF
7%
Poorly correlated
+5.22%
PEMSF - ORMNF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
More