ORRAF
Price
$1.41
Change
-$0.04 (-2.76%)
Updated
Feb 10 closing price
Capitalization
2.04B
SCBGF
Price
$22.22
Change
+$1.29 (+6.16%)
Updated
Feb 5 closing price
Capitalization
10.24B
Ad is loading...

ORRAF vs SCBGF

Header iconORRAF vs SCBGF Comparison
Open Charts ORRAF vs SCBGFBanner chart's image
Orora
Price$1.41
Change-$0.04 (-2.76%)
Volume$53.18K
Capitalization2.04B
SIG GROUP AG
Price$22.22
Change+$1.29 (+6.16%)
Volume$700
Capitalization10.24B
ORRAF vs SCBGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ORRAF vs. SCBGF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ORRAF is a Hold and SCBGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (ORRAF: $1.41 vs. SCBGF: $22.22)
Brand notoriety: ORRAF and SCBGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ORRAF: 295% vs. SCBGF: 215%
Market capitalization -- ORRAF: $2.04B vs. SCBGF: $10.24B
ORRAF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $2.04B. SCBGF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $10.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ORRAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ORRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCBGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCBGF is a better buy in the long-term than ORRAF.

Price Growth

ORRAF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCBGF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-1.92% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBGF($10.2B) has a higher market cap than ORRAF($2.04B). SCBGF has higher P/E ratio than ORRAF: SCBGF (454.55) vs ORRAF (14.93). SCBGF YTD gains are higher at: 12.730 vs. ORRAF (-14.545). SCBGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 502M vs. ORRAF (408M). SCBGF has more cash in the bank: 490M vs. ORRAF (52.6M). ORRAF has less debt than SCBGF: ORRAF (906M) vs SCBGF (2.68B). ORRAF has higher revenues than SCBGF: ORRAF (4.37B) vs SCBGF (2.78B).
ORRAFSCBGFORRAF / SCBGF
Capitalization2.04B10.2B20%
EBITDA408M502M81%
Gain YTD-14.54512.730-114%
P/E Ratio14.93454.553%
Revenue4.37B2.78B157%
Total Cash52.6M490M11%
Total Debt906M2.68B34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ORRAF: Fundamental Ratings
ORRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSPAX5.65-0.02
-0.35%
LoCorr Spectrum Income A
TGVAX26.84-0.25
-0.92%
Thornburg International Equity A
JUSRX25.28-0.48
-1.86%
JPMorgan US Equity R5
MAIMX22.78-0.50
-2.15%
Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value A
JTUCX15.10-0.51
-3.27%
JPMorgan US Small Company C

ORRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ORRAF and NEXNF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ORRAF and NEXNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORRAF
1D Price
Change %
ORRAF100%
N/A
NEXNF - ORRAF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
VRLAF - ORRAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRT - ORRAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.76%
MGIH - ORRAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+9.15%
AMBP - ORRAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More

SCBGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCBGF and OCTO have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCBGF and OCTO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBGF
1D Price
Change %
SCBGF100%
N/A
OCTO - SCBGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
NEXNF - SCBGF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
ORRAF - SCBGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGIH - SCBGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+9.15%
AMBP - SCBGF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More