OSAGF vs SFFYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OSAGF is a Hold and SFFYF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OSAGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFFYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- OSAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SFFYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
OSAGF (@Electrical Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SFFYF (@Electrical Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.11%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electrical Products (-0.40% weekly)The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
| OSAGF | SFFYF | OSAGF / SFFYF | |
| Capitalization | 4.94B | 3.94B | 125% |
| EBITDA | 572M | 992M | 58% |
| Gain YTD | 3.774 | -25.456 | -15% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 13.50 | - |
| Revenue | 4.17B | 7.4B | 56% |
| Total Cash | 860M | 694M | 124% |
| Total Debt | 2.88B | 2.03B | 142% |
OSAGF | SFFYF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SFFYF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OSAGF (100). This means that SFFYF’s stock grew significantly faster than OSAGF’s over the last 12 months.
OSAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFFYF (100). This means that OSAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFFYF’s over the last 12 months.
SFFYF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as OSAGF (96). This means that SFFYF’s stock grew similarly to OSAGF’s over the last 12 months.
OSAGF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SFFYF (55). This means that OSAGF’s stock grew similarly to SFFYF’s over the last 12 months.
OSAGF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFFYF (91). This means that OSAGF’s stock grew significantly faster than SFFYF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NBRCX | 27.56 | -0.20 | -0.72% |
| Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val C | |||
| HWSAX | 82.25 | -0.68 | -0.82% |
| Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value A | |||
| MGRQX | 39.15 | -0.39 | -0.99% |
| MFS International Growth R2 | |||
| SSDSX | 36.66 | -0.75 | -2.00% |
| DWS Small Cap Growth S | |||
| LAGWX | 22.43 | -0.48 | -2.10% |
| Lord Abbett Developing Growth A | |||
OSAGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OSAGF and PCELF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OSAGF and PCELF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OSAGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSAGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PCELF - OSAGF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SFFYF - OSAGF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PSTO - OSAGF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ORBT - OSAGF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NXPRF - OSAGF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SFFYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SFFYF and ORBT have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFFYF and ORBT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFFYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFFYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ORBT - SFFYF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PSTO - SFFYF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NXPRF - SFFYF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PHPPY - SFFYF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OSAGF - SFFYF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||