Ad is loading...
OTCM
Price
$52.16
Change
+$0.42 (+0.81%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
107 days until earnings call
PLSQF
Price
$32.69
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

OTCM vs PLSQF

Header iconOTCM vs PLSQF Comparison
Open Charts OTCM vs PLSQFBanner chart's image
OTC Markets Group
Price$52.16
Change+$0.42 (+0.81%)
Volume$2.95K
CapitalizationN/A
Plus500
Price$32.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$900
CapitalizationN/A
OTCM vs PLSQF Comparison Chart
Loading...
OTCM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OTCM vs. PLSQF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTCM is a Buy and PLSQF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (OTCM: $52.16 vs. PLSQF: $32.69)
Brand notoriety: OTCM and PLSQF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OTCM: 41% vs. PLSQF: 61%
Market capitalization -- OTCM: $695.83M vs. PLSQF: $1.59B
OTCM [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $695.83M. PLSQF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OTCM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePLSQF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • OTCM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PLSQF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLSQF is a better buy in the long-term than OTCM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OTCM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OTCM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

OTCM (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.31% price change this week, while PLSQF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

OTCM is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.23% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLSQF($1.59B) has a higher market cap than OTCM($696M). OTCM has higher P/E ratio than PLSQF: OTCM (24.04) vs PLSQF (5.08). PLSQF YTD gains are higher at: 117.406 vs. OTCM (-5.703). PLSQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 495M vs. OTCM (37.4M). PLSQF has more cash in the bank: 936M vs. OTCM (29.9M). PLSQF has less debt than OTCM: PLSQF (5.6M) vs OTCM (14.9M). PLSQF has higher revenues than OTCM: PLSQF (833M) vs OTCM (107M).
OTCMPLSQFOTCM / PLSQF
Capitalization696M1.59B44%
EBITDA37.4M495M8%
Gain YTD-5.703117.406-5%
P/E Ratio24.045.08473%
Revenue107M833M13%
Total Cash29.9M936M3%
Total Debt14.9M5.6M266%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OTCM vs PLSQF: Fundamental Ratings
OTCM
PLSQF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
193
SMR RATING
1..100
1619
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6734
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
108

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLSQF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OTCM (92). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew significantly faster than OTCM’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as OTCM (19). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew similarly to OTCM’s over the last 12 months.

OTCM's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSQF (19). This means that OTCM’s stock grew similarly to PLSQF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as OTCM (50). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew similarly to OTCM’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OTCM (67). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OTCM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OTCM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OTCM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PJEAX16.040.07
+0.44%
PGIM US Real Estate A
AEPIX24.30-0.32
-1.30%
Allspring Managed Acct Corebuilder EPI
CMNWX83.53-1.20
-1.42%
Principal Capital Appreciation A
PPQSX11.34-0.19
-1.65%
Principal MidCap Growth III R4
VWYGX47.33-1.09
-2.25%
Voya Small Cap Growth C

OTCM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OTCM and PLSQF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OTCM and PLSQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OTCM
1D Price
Change %
OTCM100%
+0.82%
PLSQF - OTCM
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QMCI - OTCM
15%
Poorly correlated
-3.91%
NHMAF - OTCM
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
MGHL - OTCM
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MXLGF - OTCM
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PLSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLSQF and OTCM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLSQF and OTCM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLSQF
1D Price
Change %
PLSQF100%
N/A
OTCM - PLSQF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
MQBKY - PLSQF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
XAUMF - PLSQF
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.64%
SPXCY - PLSQF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.73%
TMXXF - PLSQF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
More