OTCM
Price
$50.50
Change
+$0.10 (+0.20%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
606.85M
48 days until earnings call
PLSQF
Price
$41.61
Change
+$7.46 (+21.84%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.92B
Interact to see
Advertisement

OTCM vs PLSQF

Header iconOTCM vs PLSQF Comparison
Open Charts OTCM vs PLSQFBanner chart's image
OTC Markets Group
Price$50.50
Change+$0.10 (+0.20%)
Volume$3.35K
Capitalization606.85M
Plus500
Price$41.61
Change+$7.46 (+21.84%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization2.92B
OTCM vs PLSQF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OTCM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OTCM vs. PLSQF commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTCM is a Hold and PLSQF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (OTCM: $50.50 vs. PLSQF: $41.61)
Brand notoriety: OTCM and PLSQF are both not notable
OTCM represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while PLSQF is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OTCM: 58% vs. PLSQF: 100%
Market capitalization -- OTCM: $606.85M vs. PLSQF: $2.92B
OTCM [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $606.85M. PLSQF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $165.26B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.67B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OTCM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePLSQF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • OTCM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PLSQF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLSQF is a better buy in the long-term than OTCM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OTCM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLSQF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OTCM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PLSQF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OTCM is a better buy in the short-term than PLSQF.

Price Growth

OTCM (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +1.12% price change this week, while PLSQF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +25.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.77%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +63.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

OTCM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.53% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.15% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLSQF($2.92B) has a higher market cap than OTCM($607M). OTCM has higher P/E ratio than PLSQF: OTCM (21.86) vs PLSQF (11.56). PLSQF YTD gains are higher at: 36.420 vs. OTCM (-0.315). PLSQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 350M vs. OTCM (36.1M). PLSQF has more cash in the bank: 939M vs. OTCM (41.7M). OTCM has less debt than PLSQF: OTCM (11.7M) vs PLSQF (15.9M). PLSQF has higher revenues than OTCM: PLSQF (728M) vs OTCM (117M).
OTCMPLSQFOTCM / PLSQF
Capitalization607M2.92B21%
EBITDA36.1M350M10%
Gain YTD-0.31536.420-1%
P/E Ratio21.8611.56189%
Revenue117M728M16%
Total Cash41.7M939M4%
Total Debt11.7M15.9M74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OTCM vs PLSQF: Fundamental Ratings
OTCM
PLSQF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5149
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
262
SMR RATING
1..100
1720
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4232
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLSQF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OTCM (61). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OTCM’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as OTCM (26). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew similarly to OTCM’s over the last 12 months.

OTCM's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSQF (20). This means that OTCM’s stock grew similarly to PLSQF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as OTCM (60). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew similarly to OTCM’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as OTCM (42). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew similarly to OTCM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OTCMPLSQF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
42%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OTCM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INVYX32.98N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer International Equ Y
ALPCX11.10N/A
N/A
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val C
MSSVX8.39N/A
N/A
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
OWLSX22.70N/A
N/A
Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies
WOOSX18.51N/A
N/A
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity R6

OTCM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OTCM and PLSQF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OTCM and PLSQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OTCM
1D Price
Change %
OTCM100%
+0.20%
PLSQF - OTCM
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QMCI - OTCM
15%
Poorly correlated
-6.19%
NHMAF - OTCM
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGHL - OTCM
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OSCUF - OTCM
3%
Poorly correlated
+19.49%
More

PLSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLSQF and OTCM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLSQF and OTCM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLSQF
1D Price
Change %
PLSQF100%
N/A
OTCM - PLSQF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
MQBKY - PLSQF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
XAUMF - PLSQF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
SPXCY - PLSQF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
TMXXF - PLSQF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
More