Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OTPSX vs RGACX
OTPSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts OTPSX vs RGACX
ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Svc
Price$39.15
Change-$0.18 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets126.05M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.04
Change-$0.80 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
OTPSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OTPSX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTPSX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. OTPSX (126M). OTPSX pays higher dividends than RGACX: OTPSX (0.24) vs RGACX (0.07). OTPSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: OTPSX (25 years) vs RGACX (23 years). OTPSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). OTPSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than OTPSX: RGACX (250) vs OTPSX (15000). OTPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.31 vs. RGACX (12.33). OTPSX return over 5 years is better than : 83.80 vs. RGACX (45.08).
| OTPSX | RGACX | OTPSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.57 | 0.94 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.57 | 0.94 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.132 | 16.738 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 126M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.07 | 331% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.31 | 12.33 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.69 | 71.09 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.80 | 45.08 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 343.49 | 110.29 | 311% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement