Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OTPSX vs RGEBX
OTPSX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts OTPSX vs RGEBX
ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Svc
Price$39.15
Change-$0.18 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets126.05M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.30
Change-$0.80 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.37B
OTPSX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OTPSX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTPSX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. OTPSX (126M). OTPSX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: OTPSX (0.24) vs RGEBX (0.00). OTPSX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: OTPSX (25 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). OTPSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). OTPSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than OTPSX: RGEBX (250) vs OTPSX (15000). OTPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.31 vs. RGEBX (12.10). OTPSX return over 5 years is better than : 83.80 vs. RGEBX (43.73).
| OTPSX | RGEBX | OTPSX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.57 | 1.09 | 236% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.57 | 1.09 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.132 | 16.601 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 126M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.31 | 12.10 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.69 | 70.06 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.80 | 43.73 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 343.49 | 105.49 | 326% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement