OTSKF vs RCDTF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTSKF is a Hold and RCDTF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OTSKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRCDTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- OTSKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RCDTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OTSKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- OTSKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
OTSKF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RCDTF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.54%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-1.69% weekly)The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
| OTSKF | RCDTF | OTSKF / RCDTF | |
| Capitalization | 20.6B | 10.6B | 194% |
| EBITDA | 322B | 615M | 52,358% |
| Gain YTD | 45.977 | 13.587 | 338% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.48 | 26.11 | 67% |
| Revenue | 1.81T | 1.99B | 90,982% |
| Total Cash | 506B | 231M | 219,048% |
| Total Debt | 191B | 1.58B | 12,081% |
OTSKF | RCDTF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RCDTF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as OTSKF (31). This means that RCDTF’s stock grew similarly to OTSKF’s over the last 12 months.
OTSKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as RCDTF (60). This means that OTSKF’s stock grew similarly to RCDTF’s over the last 12 months.
RCDTF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OTSKF (81). This means that RCDTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OTSKF’s over the last 12 months.
OTSKF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as RCDTF (52). This means that OTSKF’s stock grew similarly to RCDTF’s over the last 12 months.
OTSKF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as RCDTF (54). This means that OTSKF’s stock grew similarly to RCDTF’s over the last 12 months.
| OTSKF | RCDTF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 13% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 13% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 16% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 28% | 2 days ago 19% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 16% | 2 days ago 18% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 12% | N/A |
OTSKF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OTSKF and OTSKY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OTSKF and OTSKY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OTSKF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTSKF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OTSKY - OTSKF | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.96% | ||
| PTKFY - OTSKF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PTKFF - OTSKF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RCDTF - OTSKF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNPHF - OTSKF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RCDTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCDTF has been loosely correlated with VRBCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCDTF jumps, then VRBCF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCDTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCDTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| VRBCF - RCDTF | 56% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RHHBF - RCDTF | 3% Poorly correlated | +6.60% | ||
| RHHBY - RCDTF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
| PTKFY - RCDTF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PTKFF - RCDTF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||