Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OWACX vs RGEBX
OWACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts OWACX vs RGEBX
Old Westbury All Cap Core
Price$27.53
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.47B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$85.25
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
OWACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OWACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWACX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. OWACX (3.47B). OWACX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . OWACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: OWACX (28 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than OWACX (0.96). OWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWACX: RGEBX (250) vs OWACX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.02 vs. OWACX (-0.43). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 41.09 vs. OWACX (31.53).
| OWACX | RGEBX | OWACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.09 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.09 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.742 | 19.331 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.47B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.43 | 14.02 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.95 | 73.12 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.53 | 41.09 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.47 | 96.51 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement