OWL
Price
$18.52
Change
-$0.17 (-0.91%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
12.06B
59 days until earnings call
PX
Price
$12.34
Change
-$0.01 (-0.08%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
1.36B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OWL vs PX

Header iconOWL vs PX Comparison
Open Charts OWL vs PXBanner chart's image
Blue Owl Capital
Price$18.52
Change-$0.17 (-0.91%)
Volume$5.95M
Capitalization12.06B
P10
Price$12.34
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
Volume$395.12K
Capitalization1.36B
OWL vs PX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OWL vs. PX commentary
Sep 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWL is a Buy and PX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 01, 2025
Stock price -- (OWL: $18.52 vs. PX: $12.34)
Brand notoriety: OWL and PX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OWL: 88% vs. PX: 54%
Market capitalization -- OWL: $12.06B vs. PX: $1.36B
OWL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $12.06B. PX’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $174.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OWL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the long-term than PX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OWL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PX’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OWL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than PX.

Price Growth

OWL (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.49% price change this week, while PX (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

PX is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.19% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($12.1B) has a higher market cap than PX($1.36B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than PX: OWL (168.36) vs PX (94.92). PX YTD gains are higher at: -1.229 vs. OWL (-17.945). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 804M vs. PX (73.1M). PX has less debt than OWL: PX (383M) vs OWL (3.65B). OWL has higher revenues than PX: OWL (2.62B) vs PX (300M).
OWLPXOWL / PX
Capitalization12.1B1.36B892%
EBITDA804M73.1M1,100%
Gain YTD-17.945-1.2291,460%
P/E Ratio168.3694.92177%
Revenue2.62B300M873%
Total Cash118MN/A-
Total Debt3.65B383M952%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PX: Fundamental Ratings
PX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
74
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
35

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OWLPX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCA27.710.22
+0.80%
First Trust China AlphaDEX® ETF
GJP24.65N/A
N/A
Synthetic Fixed Income Securities on the behalf of STRATS for Dominion Resources Series 2005-6
IVOV100.82-0.28
-0.27%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
USRD32.44-0.11
-0.33%
Themes US R&D Champions ETF
UEVM54.72-0.23
-0.42%
VictoryShares Emerging Mkts Val MomtETF

PX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PX has been loosely correlated with VCTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PX jumps, then VCTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PX
1D Price
Change %
PX100%
+0.22%
VCTR - PX
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
AAMI - PX
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
IVZ - PX
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
CG - PX
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
OWL - PX
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
More