OWL
Price
$17.79
Change
-$0.26 (-1.44%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.58B
54 days until earnings call
SLFPY
Price
$10.62
Change
-$0.32 (-2.93%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
4.51B
Interact to see
Advertisement

OWL vs SLFPY

Header iconOWL vs SLFPY Comparison
Open Charts OWL vs SLFPYBanner chart's image
Blue Owl Capital
Price$17.79
Change-$0.26 (-1.44%)
Volume$16.05M
Capitalization11.58B
ABERDEEN GROUP
Price$10.62
Change-$0.32 (-2.93%)
Volume$124
Capitalization4.51B
OWL vs SLFPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OWL vs. SLFPY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWL is a Buy and SLFPY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (OWL: $17.79 vs. SLFPY: $10.62)
Brand notoriety: OWL and SLFPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OWL: 226% vs. SLFPY: 13%
Market capitalization -- OWL: $11.58B vs. SLFPY: $4.51B
OWL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $11.58B. SLFPY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OWL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLFPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLFPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPY is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OWL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLFPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OWL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLFPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPY is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

OWL (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.94% price change this week, while SLFPY (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($11.6B) has a higher market cap than SLFPY($4.51B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than SLFPY: OWL (161.73) vs SLFPY (11.35). SLFPY YTD gains are higher at: 62.914 vs. OWL (-21.179). SLFPY has less debt than OWL: SLFPY (546M) vs OWL (3.65B). OWL has higher revenues than SLFPY: OWL (2.62B) vs SLFPY (1.68B).
OWLSLFPYOWL / SLFPY
Capitalization11.6B4.51B257%
EBITDA804MN/A-
Gain YTD-21.17962.914-34%
P/E Ratio161.7311.351,425%
Revenue2.62B1.68B156%
Total Cash118MN/A-
Total Debt3.65B546M668%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLFPY: Fundamental Ratings
SLFPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
49
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OWLSLFPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIRCX78.550.40
+0.51%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R3
LMVRX122.97N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Value R
COPLX204.07N/A
N/A
Copley Fund
ASRCX8.26N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Real Estate Income C
KNPYX126.42N/A
N/A
Kinetics Paradigm Instl

SLFPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPY and SLFPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPY and SLFPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPY
1D Price
Change %
SLFPY100%
N/A
SLFPF - SLFPY
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
OWL - SLFPY
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
BLK - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
FNCSF - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
CNS - SLFPY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More