It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTPG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OWL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
OWL (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.35% price change this week, while TPG (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.40%.
OWL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
TPG is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
OWL | TPG | OWL / TPG | |
Capitalization | 8.65B | 4.5B | 192% |
EBITDA | 633M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 57.104 | 54.986 | 104% |
P/E Ratio | 185.70 | 434.29 | 43% |
Revenue | 1.73B | 2.41B | 72% |
Total Cash | 104M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 2B | 1.26B | 158% |
OWL | TPG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago44% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago66% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago78% | 20 days ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago65% | 5 days ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago70% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FNDF | 34.72 | 0.06 | +0.17% |
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF | |||
ROKT | 54.74 | -0.05 | -0.09% |
SPDR® Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | |||
TBUX | 49.72 | -0.06 | -0.13% |
T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | |||
XHS | 91.60 | -1.59 | -1.70% |
SPDR® S&P Health Care Services ETF | |||
IHAK | 48.81 | -0.96 | -1.93% |
iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been loosely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OWL | 100% | -0.53% | ||
APO - OWL | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
ARES - OWL | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
TPG - OWL | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
STEP - OWL | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
KKR - OWL | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPG has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TPG jumps, then BX could also see price increases.