OWL
Price
$16.18
Change
+$0.29 (+1.83%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.53B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
VCTR
Price
$65.32
Change
-$1.02 (-1.54%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.36B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OWL vs VCTR

Header iconOWL vs VCTR Comparison
Open Charts OWL vs VCTRBanner chart's image
Blue Owl Capital
Price$16.18
Change+$0.29 (+1.83%)
Volume$14.67M
Capitalization10.53B
Victory Capital Holdings
Price$65.32
Change-$1.02 (-1.54%)
Volume$260.79K
Capitalization4.36B
OWL vs VCTR Comparison Chart in %
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VCTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OWL vs. VCTR commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWL is a Hold and VCTR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (OWL: $16.18 vs. VCTR: $65.32)
Brand notoriety: OWL and VCTR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OWL: 149% vs. VCTR: 43%
Market capitalization -- OWL: $10.53B vs. VCTR: $4.36B
OWL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $10.53B. VCTR’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $180.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVCTR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VCTR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VCTR is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OWL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VCTR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VCTR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than VCTR.

Price Growth

OWL (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.79% price change this week, while VCTR (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

VCTR is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.22% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($10.5B) has a higher market cap than VCTR($4.36B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than VCTR: OWL (147.09) vs VCTR (16.33). VCTR YTD gains are higher at: 1.950 vs. OWL (-28.312). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 804M vs. VCTR (489M). VCTR has less debt than OWL: VCTR (966M) vs OWL (3.65B). OWL has higher revenues than VCTR: OWL (2.62B) vs VCTR (1.03B).
OWLVCTROWL / VCTR
Capitalization10.5B4.36B241%
EBITDA804M489M164%
Gain YTD-28.3121.950-1,452%
P/E Ratio147.0916.33901%
Revenue2.62B1.03B255%
Total Cash118MN/A-
Total Debt3.65B966M378%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VCTR: Fundamental Ratings
VCTR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
20

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OWLVCTR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VCTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCMTX36.43N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Inv
CNRWX26.84N/A
N/A
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq N
FSMDX36.62N/A
N/A
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
GQEPX21.48N/A
N/A
GQG Partners US Select Quality Eq Inv
FHERX13.88N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Eq R6

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+1.83%
ARES - OWL
88%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
KKR - OWL
87%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
APO - OWL
86%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
CG - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
TPG - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
More