Ad is loading...
PAADX vs RLBCX
PAADX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAADX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R5
Price$15.14
Change+$0.15 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$32.90
Change+$0.35 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.62B
PAADX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAADX vs. RLBCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAADX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 224B vs. PAADX (1.99B). PAADX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAADX (2.93) vs RLBCX (1.69). PAADX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAADX (13 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than PAADX (0.71). PAADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (171.00). PAADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAADX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.57 vs. PAADX (-4.93). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.56 vs. PAADX (19.93).
| PAADX | RLBCX | PAADX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.380 | -3.321 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 224B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 1.69 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.93 | 0.57 | -870% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.75 | 9.53 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.93 | 33.56 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.11 | 43.10 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...