Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAADX vs RLBCX
PAADX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAADX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R5
Price$16.96
Change+$0.08 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.81
Change+$0.10 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.12B
PAADX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAADX vs. RLBCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAADX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 253B vs. PAADX (2.25B). PAADX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAADX (3.14) vs RLBCX (1.56). PAADX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAADX (13 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than PAADX (0.71). PAADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PAADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAADX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.44 vs. PAADX (5.93). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.86 vs. PAADX (20.15).
| PAADX | RLBCX | PAADX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.057 | 8.418 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 253B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.14 | 1.56 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.93 | 10.44 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.15 | 30.17 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.15 | 34.86 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.22 | 61.84 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement