Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAADX vs RLBCX
PAADX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAADX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R5
Price$17.72
Change+$0.05 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.85
Change+$0.17 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
PAADX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAADX vs. RLBCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAADX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PAADX (2.34B). PAADX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAADX (2.56) vs RLBCX (1.49). PAADX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAADX (13 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than PAADX (0.71). PAADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PAADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAADX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. PAADX (4.04). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.65 vs. PAADX (23.12).
| PAADX | RLBCX | PAADX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.899 | 14.659 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 1.49 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.04 | 9.58 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.85 | 50.48 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.12 | 40.65 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.94 | 74.05 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers