Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAADX vs RLBCX
PAADX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAADX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R5
Price$16.50
Change+$0.06 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$35.58
Change+$0.07 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.43B
PAADX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAADX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAADX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 243B vs. PAADX (2.17B). PAADX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAADX (2.82) vs RLBCX (1.63). PAADX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAADX (13 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than PAADX (0.71). PAADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PAADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAADX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. PAADX (0.97). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.95 vs. PAADX (19.94).
| PAADX | RLBCX | PAADX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.773 | 4.555 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 243B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 1.63 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.97 | 6.77 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.05 | 21.28 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.94 | 32.95 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.10 | 56.45 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement