Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAADX vs RLBCX
PAADX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAADX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R5
Price$16.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.56
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.3B
PAADX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAADX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAADX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 251B vs. PAADX (2.22B). PAADX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAADX (2.27) vs RLBCX (1.57). PAADX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAADX (13 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than PAADX (0.71). PAADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PAADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAADX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. PAADX (-0.31). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.78 vs. PAADX (21.17).
| PAADX | RLBCX | PAADX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.235 | 7.681 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 251B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 1.57 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.31 | 5.28 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.75 | 34.09 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.17 | 36.78 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.22 | 59.00 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement