Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAADX vs RLBEX
PAADX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PAADX vs RLBEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R5
Price$17.24
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$37.54
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
PAADX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAADX vs. RLBEX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAADX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. PAADX (2.27B). PAADX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: PAADX (3.14) vs RLBEX (1.81). PAADX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PAADX (13 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PAADX (0.71) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PAADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PAADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PAADX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.28 vs. PAADX (2.25). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.89 vs. PAADX (19.66).
| PAADX | RLBEX | PAADX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.59 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.59 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.778 | 10.207 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 255B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.14 | 1.81 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.25 | 7.28 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.31 | 34.45 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.66 | 36.89 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.72 | 74.67 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement