Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAADX vs RLBEX
PAADX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PAADX vs RLBEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R5
Price$16.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$36.74
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.3B
PAADX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAADX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAADX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 251B vs. PAADX (2.22B). PAADX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: PAADX (2.27) vs RLBEX (1.83). PAADX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PAADX (13 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PAADX (0.71) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PAADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PAADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PAADX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.65 vs. PAADX (-0.31). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.58 vs. PAADX (21.17).
| PAADX | RLBEX | PAADX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.59 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.59 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.235 | 7.858 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 251B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 1.83 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.31 | 5.65 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.75 | 35.22 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.17 | 38.58 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.22 | 63.99 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement