Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAAEX vs RLBAX
PAAEX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PAAEX vs RLBAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R6
Price$16.41
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$35.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.43B
PAAEX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAAEX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAAEX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 243B vs. PAAEX (2.17B). PAAEX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PAAEX (2.91) vs RLBAX (1.23). PAAEX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PAAEX (13 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PAAEX (0.61). PAAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). PAAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PAAEX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.30 vs. PAAEX (0.99). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.57 vs. PAAEX (20.39).
| PAAEX | RLBAX | PAAEX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.31 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.31 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.814 | 4.364 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 243B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 1.23 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.99 | 6.30 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.26 | 20.02 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.39 | 30.57 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.14 | 52.75 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement