Ad is loading...
PAAEX vs RLBAX
PAAEX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PAAEX vs RLBAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R6
Price$15.09
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$32.64
Change-$0.09 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.48B
PAAEX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAAEX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAAEX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. PAAEX (2.01B). PAAEX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PAAEX (3.02) vs RLBAX (1.27). PAAEX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PAAEX (13 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than PAAEX (0.61). PAAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBAX (171.00). PAAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PAAEX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.76 vs. PAAEX (-1.80). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.60 vs. PAAEX (19.59).
| PAAEX | RLBAX | PAAEX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.33 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.33 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.377 | -3.908 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 225B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 1.27 | 238% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.80 | 1.76 | -102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.05 | 8.00 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.59 | 27.60 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.26 | 38.50 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...