Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAAEX vs RLBFX
PAAEX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PAAEX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R6
Price$16.84
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.23B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.93
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.16B
PAAEX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAAEX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAAEX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. PAAEX (2.23B). PAAEX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PAAEX (2.34) vs RLBFX (2.10). PAAEX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PAAEX (13 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PAAEX (0.61) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PAAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PAAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PAAEX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.81 vs. PAAEX (2.00). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.60 vs. PAAEX (22.42).
| PAAEX | RLBFX | PAAEX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.29 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.29 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.925 | 8.193 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 252B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 2.10 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.00 | 7.81 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.11 | 34.97 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.42 | 40.60 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.41 | 65.42 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement