Ad is loading...
PAAEX vs RLBFX
PAAEX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PAAEX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R6
Price$15.09
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.48B
PAAEX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAAEX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAAEX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. PAAEX (2.01B). PAAEX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PAAEX (3.02) vs RLBFX (2.26). PAAEX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PAAEX (13 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PAAEX (0.61) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). PAAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (171.00). PAAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PAAEX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.88 vs. PAAEX (-1.80). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.40 vs. PAAEX (19.59).
| PAAEX | RLBFX | PAAEX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.30 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.30 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.377 | -3.617 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 225B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 2.26 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.80 | 2.88 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.05 | 10.75 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.59 | 33.40 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.26 | 47.01 | 43% |